No, I do not refuse to see. It is the evolutionists who refuse to see beyond their own noses. The bones are a very small part of a creature. In fact, genetically speaking, they show far less than 10% of the makeup of a creature. Therefore, one cannot say that a creature is the descendant of another with less than 10% of the evidence being available. What of the other 90%? For example, the distinctive characteristic of mammals, is that they have mammary glands. These are not present in the bones. How can one tell if the bones are of a mammal or not? The answer is one cannot. However evolutionists make that unjustified claim all the time when it is convenient for them.
The ear bones.
Do you have any memory of this thread? You were there, and post 49 is addressed to you.
Creationists have two great bludgeons with which they hammer evolutionists. One is the creationists's own amnesia. The other is their inability to imagine or even comprehend.