bump!
If a party is run by the whatever god is fashionable then there is no moral lamppost to guide that Party and will follow whoever or whatever is popular. The DemonicRat party has been sold to the Devil and for 8 years defended ever type of unethical or immoral behavior it’s leadership desired. They could always fall back on moral relativism and make any means or activity justify every end as long as they held onto power. We Christians watched the Rats defend payoffs from China in exchange for open access to our nuclear weapons secrets. We watched the White House pawned off to the highest bidder, whether they be spies, drug dealers, terrorists or whoever. If you had the cash you got entrance and no telling how many political and military favors were sold. We watched a President of the United States pawing and having sex with his underlings as the feminists screeched about consensual sex by the most powerful man in the world was ok. We watched woman after woman thrown down elevator shafts when they dared to speak up against getting fondled in the WH? Situational ethics are ok for feminags if he vetos the late term abortion bills.
We could go on and on about Elian and other miscarriages of justice or the harassment of Christian/Conservative groups by the IRS, but the point has been made. A Party who ignores it’s moral base is a Party at risk. The Republican Party should thank God that it has a group like the Christian Coalition who will and did stand up and take the bullets when we see the country going the wrong direction. We stood for the Party in South Carolina by defeating McCain and his Godless agenda and then took the wrath of PravdABC for that stand. We voted and worked in mass for GW Bush because we saw a man who was following God’s path in his life. We saw a man who was born again and was in the race because God called him. We knew that this man was to become one of the great Presidents of our time. You do not have to be accepted and fail Oxford or walk the ivory towers to be a great President and many would argue that intelligence is not the greatest asset to great leaders. Churchill was not a great thinker although a great drinker, however he inspired a world to stop an unstoppable foe. No, a truly great President must have the country’s welfare in front of his own. He must ignore the polls that measure his popularity and take unpopular stands to let the world know that he stands for something and this President has taken many unpopular stands, starting with tax cuts. A President who will not take a stand for anything is a clinton.
The Christian Coalition and other Conservative groups are now under attack from Emperor Dashole! While the country is under attack from real terrorists, the Emperor and his congress has decided the most important piece of legislation is not energy or defense but Campaign Finance Reform?? The President should veto this bill for no other reason than it is wasting the congress’ valuable time. Out of an energy company going banko from the worst energy crisis since 1974 we do not have time to discuss meaningful energy independence, but have to pass Campaign Finance. Only the SewerRats would come up with logic like that. Politics over the country every time! We need leadership now! It is time to take Do Nothing Dashole out to the woodshed along with the traitors in our own Party and tell them to quit putting Party and Politics in front of the country and get to work on the real issues. Any wimp can pass something as small as CF but it takes a real man to pass energy reform or cut spending. It is time for Texas Justice and teach those SewerRats why Texans always wear their boots. Why pass laws if the Rats can’t obey the ones we have on the books already? Do they need more laws, ethics and morals to break?
Pray for GW and the Truth
No less resolve than what?
He can get political advantage from vetoing it too, if he explains how it is unfair, unconstitutional, and a threat to our liberties.
He can explain that this is where our system of checks and balances works, by preventing one arm of government from empowering itself at the expense of the public.
He can explain that he will now illustrate just how that system works by vetoing this bill that by all rights should never have been passed, much less introduced, in the first place.
He will veto it to protect our constitutional rights against those in Congress who would deprive us of those rights.
Such a speech ought to leave more than a few democRats hopping mad, I would think.
(An e-mail to this effect has been sent to him; if you agree, send more.)