Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Examiner columnist blasts "FreeRepugnant.com"
sf examiner ^ | Feb 15, 02 | Debby Morse

Posted on 02/15/2002 10:23:06 PM PST by churchillbuff

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-350 next last
To: Jeff Gordon
Any column this dunce writes could not come close to anything that I could write for many reasons.Mine being based on facts would be the more ideal one to read vs. her's just filled with Left Wing ACLU NOW spin that we can get out of any Jesse Jackson or Hillary Clinton press conference.
161 posted on 02/16/2002 6:56:56 AM PST by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
RE: #67, Outstanding! ROTF . . .
162 posted on 02/16/2002 7:05:29 AM PST by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: jwh_Denver
After reading "arguments" like that, I'm more dedicated than ever to wanting to keep my body private.

Maybe if we saw her body, we may just ask her to keep it private, too- please!!!! Do we need a road map to find her knees?

Who is this person, and how did she get to know Satan so well?

163 posted on 02/16/2002 7:11:10 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: unsycophant; Shermy
ROFL, thanks for the giggles this am.
164 posted on 02/16/2002 7:18:04 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Thanks for the quote Debby! And yes, you are a little crampy!
165 posted on 02/16/2002 7:18:04 AM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
OMG, I am so ticked! You got TWO mentions? Hmmmm.
166 posted on 02/16/2002 7:20:18 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gg188
. . . when these people lack the ability to cogently advocate their positions, and when their positions are indefensible, they INEVITABLY resort to, "well, if you disagree with me, it means you hate women.

The ad hominem attacks were perfected under Klintoon and his administration. It became the "norm" for "dialogue." Anyone who disagrees with the liberal/socialist agenda has something "wrong" with them. Rather than accept the fact that dissenters can reason and form their own opinions based on moral convictions and logic, the liberal/socialists blame the dissenter's "wrong thoughts" on "inflamers" the dissenter listens to, i.e., Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Medved, Michael Savage, Michael Reagan, etc.

Of course, those "inflamers" also have something "wrong" with them which is why there is a tremendous effort underway to shut down the conservative talk shows.

By making ad hominem attacks, the liberal/socialist diverts attention away from (another tactic the socialists use) the inherent right and wrong of an act.

167 posted on 02/16/2002 7:25:26 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I don't communicate with her kind, anyone that can look at a picture of a baby clinging to life and call it "meant to shock" is too low on the food chain for me to be able to communicate with.

I would have much better luck communicating to my dog my desire for him to sit than converse with her.

168 posted on 02/16/2002 7:26:17 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
The examples she used are what she thinks of as "hate mail"? If she wants to see irrational, vicious, potty talk, she needs to cruise on over to DU where they don't even attempt to debate or state logical positions.
169 posted on 02/16/2002 7:29:37 AM PST by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Well, I may post on "FreeRepugnant", but at least I don't write for the San Francisco Pelvic Examiner.
170 posted on 02/16/2002 7:31:05 AM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
e-mail to Ms. Morse:

Dear Debby:

As a balanced independent conservative, I read your FreeRepugnant.com article. Pretty sweeping generalization I'd say, and a very selective use of the comments you decided to publish. Of course there are extremists in any group, and nobody should apologize for their excess. I certainly don't endorse those you decided to publish.

One thing Free Republic has done is provide a gathering site for conservatives to share articles, news and thoughts that, more often than not, the liberal media decides to exclude from their lofty, condescending, receding circulation. Perhaps there is an element of truth to the purpose of this site that so offends you. When I read a supposed authoritative, and balanced (we'll pass on objective) being "unsettled by "Hoo-yah!", I can picture the trauma.

You know what would be nice, is for someone like you to do a "let's listen in" on former President Clinton when lizards in his inner circle worked it to assassinate the character of Juanita Broaderick and Jennifer Flowers. Listening in on how to control the spin when 100 laptops containing information on US intelligence up and walked away would have been fun too.

Yes, a conservative website that includes god knows who contributing must be simply appalling and repugnant to you. Perhaps your paper has a generous disability program for the mental anguish you have suffered. And I do look forward to you publishing a similar article from some of the more Hoo-yah liberal websites, but won't hold my breath.

PS: you'll get over it, even while watching thousands more abandon brain dead papers like the Examiner for other more effective sites in pursuit of the truth. The truth is starting to win some batles these days, or haven't you noticed.

Regards, Boo!

171 posted on 02/16/2002 7:37:28 AM PST by gohabsgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BJungNan
The reference to someone that wished there would be another earthquake is San Francisco was weak, but I have had people tell me they think a Nuke should be dropped on my home in China. When I told them they should not say such things, they insisted in repeated replies that they were serious.

Welcome to the Internet. People like that are hardly unique to Free Republic. Go to any discussion forum and you'll find them there.

172 posted on 02/16/2002 7:43:38 AM PST by kezekiel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Now Howlin, you know I stopped shocking you a long time ago, hehe.
173 posted on 02/16/2002 7:44:13 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
This is just more Marxist/liberal thought police action.
Hand over your gun, your tax dollars, and your unborn baby, and she'll let you speak your mind.
174 posted on 02/16/2002 7:46:17 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
(Quick glimpse at some of the messages I got: "Is that the way you spend all your time? Hating people?" "Would you look down from Heaven and defend your mother if she had aborted you?" "Your panic and fear is obvious by the way you write.")

Boy, if that's what she calls hate mail, she's been living an overly sheltered existence.

175 posted on 02/16/2002 7:48:12 AM PST by Cleburne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cleburne
Boy, if that's what she calls hate mail, she's been living an overly sheltered existence.

To a liberal pro-death supporting woman who's biggest concern is self , any truth is considered hate mail.

176 posted on 02/16/2002 7:52:47 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
How these feminazis make this quantum leap of illogic is amazing. How is it that not favoring killing babies is "hating women"?

It has little to do with "logic" and everything to do with what is "Correct" in their "Politics".

In 1939-1945 German culture, not favoring killing "das Untermenchen" was considered hating "das Vaterland" and was considered hating "der Volk".

Such dogma is not open to logical discussion in a culture that proclaimed "Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Fuhrer". Such dogma is not open to discussion in a culture that proclaims one flavor of Politics to be "Correct".

As I noted on another post, I am not a religious person and I consider myself to be Agnostic.

As an Agnostic physician-in-training in medical school, I held a severely pre-mature female infant smaller than my hand in the Neonatal I.C.U. that the Nursing Staff had nicknamed "Minnie Mouse". Society considered "Minnie Mouse" a "human baby girl". As a radiologist, I now rountinely view "fetuses" on ultrasound that are of greater gestational age and much greater estimated fetal weight than "Minnie Mouse" was. However, they can be killed legally by partial birth abortion.

Leaving religion completely out of the equation, as an Agnostic I see absolutely no logic as to why "Minnie Mouse" was a "human baby girl" whose deliberate killing would be legally considered "murder" while the deliberate killing of a gestationally older "fetus" by partial birth abortion is considered "a woman's right to choose".

I especially do not see any logic in this when it is far more dangerous to the mother to introduce instrumentation into the vaginal canal to crush the fetal head than it would be to let the "fetus" squirt out all in one piece.

There is no medical reason to perform the risky crushing of the fetal head rather than let the fetus squirt out in one piece. The only reason the mother is subjected to the risky fetal head crushing instrumentation is so that, at the end of the day, the "fetus" will be legally considered "tissue" in a red "Biohazard" plastic trash bag rather an a "premature infant" in the Neonatal I.C.U.

If there is a God and if there is a Judgement Day, I feel that I can logically defend my Agnosticism to God but I have a hard time seeing how Debbie can logically defend her abortion dogma.

An individual relying solely on Religious Dogma has no need for logic. The argument simply boils down to, "Believe as I believe or you will burn in Hell for all Eternity".

Likewise, Debbie has no need for logic. Debbie simply relies on nothing more than her own Political Dogma: "Believe as I believe or you hate women".

Consider that only those posters on Free Republic that make dogmatic statements are quoted by Debbie in her Examiner article while everybody else who may resort to logical debate is completely ignored by her in order to paint all of Free Republic as "FreeRepugnant.com".

Pretty dogmatic and "repugnant" tactic, don't you think?

177 posted on 02/16/2002 8:18:03 AM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Sour spleeen venting from some feminist whack who spends her days snorkling in the noisome sewer known as Sodom on the Bay.

Ignore her.

178 posted on 02/16/2002 8:25:45 AM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xm177e2
LOL some of my best friends are women. Wow, I never thought I was quotable. Next time I'll add the sarcasm symbol, never know who will try to interpret my wise comments.
179 posted on 02/16/2002 8:26:00 AM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 1/1,000,000th%
Don't want all the SF papers to go bankrupt, what will they use for their doggie doo?
180 posted on 02/16/2002 8:31:13 AM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson