Skip to comments.
Farmers: Get a Job!
Future of Freedom Foundation ^
| February 2002
| Sheldon Richman
Posted on 02/15/2002 2:58:58 PM PST by RJCogburn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
1
posted on
02/15/2002 2:58:58 PM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: RJCogburn
Good Post
To: RJCogburn
Man. Pretty clear that this guy knows nothing about the subject of farming or the current farming crisis.
3
posted on
02/15/2002 3:32:20 PM PST
by
jrherreid
To: jrherreid
Why don't you offer us some of your expertise?
To: RJCogburn
But not the farmers. They have apparently been bestowed with the Divine Right to Farm. If they can't make enough to live on, they have the legal power to loot the rest of us so they can stay on the farm anyway. This sounds like insanity. Would someone please explain it to me?Yes. Domestic food production is important to our national security.
5
posted on
02/15/2002 3:35:21 PM PST
by
xm177e2
To: Straight Vermonter
Well, for example, while the price of goods such as cereal, bread and such has gone up along with inflation, the price of wheat per bushel hasn't changed (even with inflation) since the 1970's. The companies, rather than increase what they pay on, say wheat, have mostly just increased wages for their own workers. Which means that small farms really can't compete unless they are part of a cooperative (the big cooperative in Vermont that actually works pretty well is Cabot). And the cooperatives have a hard time competing with Canadian prices--Canadian farmers are fully subsidized by their government. But rather than try and buy US products, a lot of US food companies, naturally, go for the cheaper Canadian products. It's a complicated issue that can't just be blamed on the farmers--it's a whole rash of failed agricultural programs and a fair amount of royal screwings over by the industrial food producers.
6
posted on
02/15/2002 3:41:43 PM PST
by
jrherreid
To: jrherreid
the farming crisis doesnt alarm me cause I get all my food from the grocery store :)
7
posted on
02/15/2002 3:41:52 PM PST
by
isom35
To: RJCogburn
Instead of starving people and wealthy farmers (which is what should have happened if the doomsayers were right), we have fat people (see the recent Surgeon General's report) and farmers bellyaching about low crop prices.
We also have a lot of fat farmers. The feed business where I buy my horse feed is a hangout for about a dozen farmers, most of whom are around 300 pounds. Point is, these guys are almost always there, good weather and bad, just hanging out. I recently checked that web site that shows farm subsidies by county, some of these guys are getting up to $800k a year in crop subsidies to not grow tobacco.
8
posted on
02/15/2002 3:44:55 PM PST
by
doosee
Comment #9 Removed by Moderator
To: Friend_Or_Foe
Yep, that's the guys. I used to work on a farm that was part of that cooperative. Great stuff--especially the extra sharp cheddar.
To: xm177e2
Yes. Domestic food production is important to our national security. Then why does the government burn it, bury it, and pay farmers not produce it? Hank
To: RJCogburn
The real problems have to do with corporate farming, illegal labor thereby deflating the real cost of food, vertical ownership and the profiterring from value added processes. The game is fixed and when you see what the remedies are no one has the courage to stand up and say ok let's pay a fair wage for farm work, let's pay a fair price for farm produce, and let's keep so few hands from controlling so much of the production and supply. Let's start subsidizing family farms.
12
posted on
02/15/2002 3:53:28 PM PST
by
RWG
To: RJCogburn
What does Sheldon Richman have to worry about? All of his food comes from the grocery store or the restaurant. That's where food comes from.
If and when the day arrives when Richman goes to the grocery store, or to the restaurant, and discovers they have no more food, he can always fall back on his, what, farming skills? Hunting skills? Fishing skills? One almost hopes that such a day arrives, if only for his comeuppance, but that would mean no food for the rest of us, either.
People need food. They do not need magazine editors. It is that simple.
13
posted on
02/15/2002 3:55:02 PM PST
by
Jay W
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: RJCogburn
Doesn't Sam Donaldson have a sheep farm out in Arizona, how much is he getting???
To: RJCogburn
If GM or Ford was to go on strike for a year and no new cars were available,the moment they went back to work carlots would have a hay day,no hagglin,just demand the price they want and they and the finance companies would love it,come to think about it,maybe the farmer should go on strike,withhold the beef,chickens, eggs, milk,butter,veggies,just quit producing for a year except what they would use for themselves.Now do you get the picture?The government subsidies are there to insure there is always enough to eat,as long as there are subsidies,no farmer will go on strike.
To: Hank Kerchief
It's the capability that's important, not the actual food itself. If we got into a situation where we needed that food, we could just stop destroying it.
18
posted on
02/15/2002 4:06:13 PM PST
by
xm177e2
To: isom35
Good Answer.
19
posted on
02/15/2002 4:08:30 PM PST
by
ImpBill
To: RJCogburn
First of all someone should tell this shallow nitwit there is no such thing as "free market" (or "free trade" for that matter) every market including farming has government restrictions...even "deregulated" markets have regulators imposing strict regulations....
More important if a farmer is hit with bad weather destroying his crop he's likely done for an entire year...Can this "magazine editor" dole out thousands of, maybe tens of thousands of dollars only to have it all be ruined in one day and survive untill the next year?....
In other words if every year over the last 2 centurys a farmer went out of business we would not only be dependent on Arabs for oil we'd also be dependent on, worse yet, someone for or food.
It's nitwits like this "magazine editor" who has no problem with the government going in and shutting off irrigation water to farmers to save bottom feeding sucker fish.
I'll bet this same "magazine editor" would object to letting the farmer sell his farmland for development but have NO problem with the government taking it to save the environment or some phony "endangered species".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-168 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson