Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lord of the Rings Discussion Group (The Green Dragon Inn)

Posted on 02/15/2002 7:01:31 AM PST by HairOfTheDog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 761-772 next last
To: HairOfTheDog
And good morning to you, too, and all in the Inn.

I will try to avoid "spoiling" for those (Are there any? Apparently) who did not while away their adolesence wrapped between the covers of these books. I must have read them thirty times, put them down for twenty years, just saw the movie, and read it through again. I even love the appendixes (sp? appendi?)Oh, Just wait 'til you get to the part where....No! Never mind!

I imagine Middle Earth in the time of Aragorn's son's reign, Eregion florishing, and trees walking north of Bywater. The story continues on.

181 posted on 02/16/2002 8:48:16 AM PST by frodolives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: frodolives
I think it is great that there are some who are just now reading it... it means that the story still goes on, as you say... There are still new hobbits being born, not just the ones that have lost their covers and gather dust on our shelves.
182 posted on 02/16/2002 8:57:46 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
please to add me to your ping list. Just today finished the entire book and browsed the appendix. Alas, the movie has moved on from my area.

I wish the entire first book had been a 3 hour film; the first chapter does an excellent job of setting up the idyllic life in the Shire. You can sense the innocence soon to be lost, and get just a glimpse of the backbone and courage within the hobbits.

btw, are planning to do a chapter a week, and start the discussion on Saturdays? If so, I will have to schedule my reading, hehe.

183 posted on 02/16/2002 9:00:05 AM PST by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
My heart has always drawn me to the simpler things.

Maybe you ARE a hobbit...

;-)

184 posted on 02/16/2002 9:03:25 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: fnord
A chapter per week was the plan, but Chapter I took less than 24 hours before the guests here began to wander... some chapters may take more time, some less... but these early chapters sort-of continue the same theme, so I think it is OK to continue on. Forgive me for not promising to hold to a schedule...

I am enjoying the detail and time Tolkien gave to developing the hobbit characters and the foreshadowing of the dark times to come before they set out. The film could not reasonably have been expected to do all that... A full 17 years passes between the party and the beginning of the journey... and I think it took Gandalf about two minutes to get our Frodo out the door in the film, although it was hinted that he had traveled far...

More excerpts:

…Frodo began to feel restless, and the old paths seemed to well-trodden. He looked at maps, and wondered what lay beyond their edges…. He took to wandering further afield and more often by himself; and Merry and his other friends watched him anxiously. Often he was seen walking and talking with the strange wayfarers that began at this time to appear in the Shire….

…Elves, who seldom walked in the Shire, could now be seen passing westward through the woods in the evening, passing and not returning…

...Frodo often met strange dwarves of far countries, seeking refuge in the West. They were troubled, and some spoke in whispers of the Enemy and of the Land of Mordor...


185 posted on 02/16/2002 9:14:28 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Ooooh, Chapter 2. Great! I remember the first time I read LOTR. This chapter got me hooked.
"You have not seen him," Gandalf broke in. [referring to Gollum]

"No, and I don't want to," said Frodo. "I can't understand you. Do you mean to say that you, and the Elves, have let him live on after all those horrible deeds? No at any rate he is as bad as an Orc, and just an enemy. He deserves death."

"Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve death. And some deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement....snip....And he is bound up with the fate of the Ring. My heart tells me that he has some part to play yet, for good or ill, before the end; and when that comes, the pity of Bilbo may rule the fate of many--yours not least..."

At first, I was disappointed that this section was transposed to the Mines of Moria. But after subsequent viewings, it has that kind of gut-wrenching impact, so close to Gandalf's fall and hearing Gollum's footsteps.
186 posted on 02/16/2002 9:14:39 AM PST by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Penny1
TO ALL: Sorry to break in. Old Business........

No one else ever touched the ring except for Frodo and Sam (and Gollum, that is), unless my memory is failing me.......which is entirely possible because it very often does...

Touchers of the Ring in LOTR (To the best of MY knowledge):

1) Bilbo (at beginning of book)

2) Frodo (given to him by Bilbo)

3) Tom Bombadil (Examines it and remains UNCHANGED!!!! by his encounter; which has always bugged me as to what manner of creature HE is)

4) Samwise (takes it when he thinks Frodo is dead by Shelob)

5) Golum (climax scene)

187 posted on 02/16/2002 9:17:36 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Another Freeper (and I apologize, but I can't remember who) pointed out that by putting the story of the Last Alliance in the movie's prologue, the movie changed the tone of the book. In the book, the innocent cheeriness of the first chapter is undiluted by any knowledge of the Shadow until the second, giving us a steady progression from light into the darkness that hangs over the rest of the books. In the movie, on the other hand, we have a "light sandwich," with only a brief enjoyment of the ideal life of the Shire placed between the prologue and Gandalf's search for answers.

That's not a criticism of the movie, really, just an observation of the difference a small change in format can make to the tone.

Yours in Truth,

188 posted on 02/16/2002 9:20:02 AM PST by Buggman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Carolina
A lot of the background from Chapter 2 was moved around to other parts of the story for the film, like all of the history at the beginning of the film... we did not learn about any of that until Chapter 2 or Rivendell. My review posted here from the first time I saw the film complained a bit that the dark forces were brought out so early and vividly in the film. I loved most of all the innocence at the beginning of this story, and the foreshadowing that begins in hints and whispers. Tolkien had a gift for that, but Jackson's way works too... most people would not have been satisfied, I guess to see Frodo and Gandalf sit around that table for two hours and spell it out slowly... though some of us would have.
189 posted on 02/16/2002 9:26:37 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Gandalf can be added to that list. In the book, rather than throwing an envelope containing the ring into the fire, he throws the ring directly (At last we can speak about this without breaking the chapter barrier).

Two other mortals that can be added are Isildur and Déagol (As we learn in Gandalf's summary).

190 posted on 02/16/2002 9:31:13 AM PST by Romestamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: DoctorMichael
Gandalf can be added to that list. In the book, rather than throwing an envelope containing the ring into the fire, he throws the ring directly (At last we can speak about this without breaking the chapter barrier).

Two other mortals that can be added are Isildur and Déagol (As we learn in Gandalf's summary).

191 posted on 02/16/2002 9:31:16 AM PST by Romestamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Good point... They should not have jumped ahead like that (hobbits are hard to keep on topic)...

Bad Hobbit! (Shamefacedly retreating into a dark corner.)

192 posted on 02/16/2002 9:32:42 AM PST by Overtaxed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Buggman
That is interesting--they took the story that Gandalf related in Chapter 2 and placed in the very beginning with Galadriel telling the story instead. It does make a huge difference, because in the book the shadow and threat of what is to come creeps slowly onto the idyllic scene. The reader slowly becomes aware of the gravity of the threat, rather than having it presented full-force right at the start. Something that a book can do where a movie can't necessarily present as successfully...

There was an awful lot of care and thought put into how a story is told in a movie setting as opposed to on the printed page. I'm amazed at how well they balanced their faithfulness to the story with the necessity of adapting it to an entirely different medium.

-penny

193 posted on 02/16/2002 9:34:40 AM PST by Penny1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Overtaxed
Bad Hobbit! (Shamefacedly retreating into a dark corner.)

Better leave some room in that corner for me....and for the dozen others that "broke the rules" as well... ;)

Party in the corner!!!!!!
< veg >

-penny

194 posted on 02/16/2002 9:37:07 AM PST by Penny1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I think the most important thing in Chapter 2 is the establishment of Sam's character before the journey began. Frodo may be the ringbearer, but Sam is just as much the protagonist. The way that the journey changes him is one of the best aspects of the book.

In this chapter, Sam let's Sandyman walk all over him at the Green Dragon and has such little understanding of Gandalf as to believe Gandalf would turn him into "something unnatural." And, last but not least, his feelings about embarking on this important journey can be summed up as "Me go and see Elves and all! Hooray!"

195 posted on 02/16/2002 9:38:31 AM PST by Romestamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
After our little chat on the "other thread" about how Sam reminds us sometimes of a faithful golden retriever, I cracked up totally at this line:

[Gandalf speaking to Samwise]"You shall go away with Mr. Frodo!" "Me sir!" cried Sam, springing up like a dog invited for a walk. "Me go and see Elves and all! Hooray!" he shouted, and then burst into tears.

Sam is such a dear....

-penny

196 posted on 02/16/2002 9:39:39 AM PST by Penny1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I loved most of all the innocence at the beginning of this story, and the foreshadowing that begins in hints and whispers.

In the movie, Gandalf is sitting in semi-darkness in a chair at Bag End, furiously puffing away smoke from his pipe and muttering:

"Riddles in the dark, riddles in the dark."
The crescendo of tension begins.
197 posted on 02/16/2002 9:40:04 AM PST by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Romestamo
Thanks.........I'll have to read this (Gandalf) part again.
198 posted on 02/16/2002 9:47:45 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Romestamo
I think it is interesting that Merry, rather than Sam, is given the first emphasis in Frodo's circle of friends... Merry accompanying him on his long walks, Sam defending him from the Green Dragon, but introduced as an employee, rather than a close friend. I wonder sometimes if Tolkien’s view of the roles the characters would eventually play was still developing in his own mind as he wrote.
199 posted on 02/16/2002 9:48:43 AM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I noticed that too--both Merry and Pippin were singled out as being Frodo's closest friends while Sam is never mentioned in such terms. And you're right, Merry is the one who is the most involved in Frodo's life. Yet we are given many more glimpses of Sam than we are of M&P at this point--he is more fully developed as a character, as if we're being well set up for him to be the one whose life is most closely bound to Frodo's.

Perhaps the idea is that while Merry and Pippin became Frodo's friends during the peaceful years before the mission begins, Frodo's and Sam's friendship is forged in the trials and hardships of the mission itself. And it is their friendship that makes the biggest impact on the story.

There is also a great deal of "class consciousness" that underpins the story--Merry and Pippin are seen as Frodo's equals in class, while Sam is on a lower rung of society...at the beginning of the story...

-penny

200 posted on 02/16/2002 10:01:45 AM PST by Penny1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 761-772 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson