[vannrox]

Permission is hereby granted to make as many copies of this pamphlet as desired providing that (1) the title, author and copyright are shown, (2) the statement "Copied by permission" is included, (3) the entire text is copied, and (4) the copies are provided free without any charge whatsoever.

I hope that I am abiding by the authors wishes. He did a great job!

[Dick Bachert]

It's all really quite simple:

The control elite (America's counterpart to the European royalty) cannot FULLY have their enlightened way with us would-be serfs if WE ARE ARMED. Quite dangerous, old chap. All those nasty old bullets flying about, you know...! Which is PRECISELY why the Founding Fathers left is the Second Amendment.

It's for our own good!

THE MOST DANGEROUS WORDS IN ANY LANGUAGE ARE “WHY THAT CAN’T HAPPEN HERE !”

LIKE HELL IT CAN’T!

[Wm Bach]

Excellent!

[martian_22]

It's always been evident to me that a body of "intellectuals", who hold high positions of control, have acted in concert to incrementally remove the right to self-defense. Their agenda has been concealed from public view.

If this isn't a plain old-fashioned conspiracy for close to 100 years, I don't know what is.

[MileHi]

Excellent BUMP!

[gnarledmaw]

The various states positions as noted in item 3 is not compatible with the rest of the article. Is he merely pointing that out as a fact or is he suggesting that it is a valid interpretation?

His writing also infers that he supports the "infantry" interpretation. Im not convinced, I think there is ample evidence for a broader interpretation based on the Framers writings and actions.

[linuxnut]

Alan Keys sums it up quite nicely, (and I am paraphrasing) "If police officers and military personnel, who come from the general population, are allowed to bear Arms, it makes sense that the general population, from which they came from, be allowed to do the same."