Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Child-Free and Carefree
ABC News ^ | February 14, 2002 | Geraldine Sealey

Posted on 02/14/2002 7:09:10 AM PST by Artie_Kay

When Ellen Metter was a young girl, she didn't go for the baby-doll thing. She dressed her Barbie up as Mary Tyler Moore — a single, urban professional with her own imaginary apartment and fun date nights."She was hip," says Metter, author of the recent humor book Cheerfully Childless. Now Metter, 42, wonders if her young lack of interest in nurturing dolls foreshadowed her adult lack of desire to have children.

Like many women who decide against children, Metter says she questioned her leanings on occasion — either through her own self-exploration or others' prodding questions. When she met her boyfriend a few years ago, she thought she wanted to have kids with him because it seemed like the ultimate expression of their love. But the couple eventually decided against it.

"My boyfriend has great genes, he's handsome, we'd make an adorable child," Metter says. "But then again, Hitler had parents."

Humor has helped Metter communicate with others about a topic she says is misunderstood by a family-oriented culture. "It's not right for me," Metter says. "And if you're like me and never had this visceral attraction to kids then it's probably not right for you either."

Indeed, more people are deciding kids are not for them as the ranks of the childless continue to swell.

Although a government report released this week showed American women having more children than at any time in the last 30 years — in many cases, a good economy made it easier for women to have additional children — more women are also postponing childbearing or foregoing it all together.

Of women ages 40 to 44 years old, near the end of their childbearing years, 19 percent are childless, the U.S. Census Bureau reports — a number almost twice as high as 20 years earlier.

While those statistics include women who would like to have kids or are infertile, more women say they're childless by choice. Nearly 7 million women of childbearing age defined themselves as voluntarily childless in 1995, the latest year available, up from 2.4 in 1982, according to the National Center of Health Statistics.

Shunned and Misunderstood

It's no coincidence that voluntary childlessness is on the rise as women are becoming more educated and eligible for a wide variety of opportunities outside of family life, says Madelyn Cain, author of the book The Childless Revolution.

Childless couples tend to be a more educated and affluent group than their counterparts with kids. With no child-related expenses to shell out, childless couples have more disposable income to spend — 60 percent more on entertainment, 79 percent more on food and 101 percent more on dining out than parents, according to American Demographics magazine.

Despite their growing numbers, many childless individuals and couples complain that they are ignored as a legitimate interest group and consumer class and even shunned by society for their lifestyles.

"We are with childlessness where we were with homosexuality 20 years ago," Cain says. "We always talk about family-friendly America. It is always part and parcel of a politician's package. But the package they're selling doesn't match the general public."

Those who are childless say they get all sorts of unwelcome, and unfair, observations from strangers, family, friends, and co-workers alike. They're told they are: Self-centered, deviant, workaholic, immature, and child-haters.

In reality, Cain said, the reasons people are childless are varied and complex: Some have environmental, religious, medical or professional reasons. For others, it's a matter of happenstance — they didn't meet the right partner or the time just never seemed right.

Child-Free: More Selfless Than Parenting?

Some particularly rabid Web sites devoted to the "child-free," as many like to be called, refer to parents as "breeders" and condemn procreation in general, but they seem to be in a vocal minority. Most who are childless by choice say they respect parents and enjoy children. They just know parenting is not for them.

A lack of understanding about the choice to be childless can be annoying when it comes from acquaintances, and downright devastating when it comes from loved ones, Cain said.

"When your mother says, 'You're gonna regret it,' if that doesn't send a chill through you or wake you in the middle of the night …" says Cain, who interviewed 125 childless women for her book. "Those are terrible things to hold over someone's head."

Lisa Casablanca Simmons, 36, knows what it's like to be poked with questions about the choice she made as a teenager not to have children. Married for 14 years, Simmons said her husband's family first thought she was selfish.

But Simmons sees her decision as rooted in not just honest self-assessment — she thinks she would make a "terrible mom" because she's not very patient — but also selflessness.

"Isn't it selfish to bring an unwanted child into this world?" says Simmons, who lives in Los Angeles. "We're doing right by not bringing an unwanted child into the world."

Finding a Substitute for the PTA

For Kathleen Sartoris, 32, of Queens, N.Y., choosing not to have children also was part of an honest, and in her view necessary, prioritizing of her life.

"I am sure I will miss out if I never have kids, but I know I will miss out on other things if I do," said Sartoris. "It's a tradeoff."

Sartoris and her husband of 10 years travel for work and pleasure, are going back to school, and spend time volunteering. Unlike their friends who have children, Sartoris and her husband also have the freedom to pick up new hobbies and activities and not feel guilty or time-strapped, she said.

"If you have children, you have to consider your child," Sartoris said. "The idea that you can do it all and have it all is a real misconception."

The growing popularity of an international social network for childless individuals and couples, called No Kidding, is further evidence of the increased visibility of the "child-free." No Kidding now has 71 chapters and has a convention set for next month in Las Vegas.

What No Kidding provides is the kind of social networking that many parents find in activities centered on their children, members say.

"PTA, school sports, carpooling. For adults who have children, the children have a huge social network, and are usually a starting point for meeting other adults," says Mitch Greenberg, 41, who organizes events for a Maryland chapter of No Kidding.

The child-free social group fills a social void for nonparents, he said, and helps replace friends who may have lost touch because parenting consumes their time.

At some point, friends who once had many things in common find themselves alienated from one another — even if reluctantly — when they choose different paths when it comes to childbearing. "Those who we lose contact with are usually the people who have children," says Greenberg, who has been married for 15 years. "You no longer have things in common, and they're usually not available to do things," he said.

Along with social isolation, some childless people claim that our family-centered culture can be unfair to them. Some childless workers complain of having to pick up the slack for working parents, or say they are more likely to be expected to work longer hours or weekends.

What's Fair for the Child-Free?

Other complaints from nonparents include watered-down group health insurance packages to compensate for others' young dependents, or the myriad benefits such as unpaid leave, child tax credits or greater 401(k) contributions that are reserved for parents.

Of course, working parents also have complaints about how they're treated in the workplace, and Cain doesn't deny that government and corporate policies can punish both parents and nonparents for the choices they've made.

Parents and nonparents need to start communicating with one another about what is fair, Cain said. Working parents should be able to leave the job if their child is sick, Cain said, but so should childless workers have opportunities to take personal time away for themselves as well.

A compromise could be for companies to offer "personal hours" away from work instead of entire days, so workers could use their hours to fill their personal or family needs without leaving for an entire day, Cain suggests.

But Cain, who has a 16-year-old daughter, born when she was almost 40 years old, said her greatest hope is for people with and without children to understand and accept one another and their lifestyle choices.

"It could have been that I didn't have a child, would it have made me a lesser being? I hope not," Cain said. "Each woman's life should be valued as important for the choices she makes."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-308 next last
To: Phantom Lord
LOL. Face it, PL, you're not REALLY Catholic.

I can join the Elks, but unless I abide by THEIR rules and pay my dues or whatever, I'm no Elk.

201 posted on 02/14/2002 10:00:01 AM PST by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
LOL! I know that episode.
202 posted on 02/14/2002 10:07:57 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: oremus
Don't preach to me.
203 posted on 02/14/2002 10:09:42 AM PST by MotleyGirl70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: oremus
Are you trying to turn people against Catholosism or something???? Because I hate to tell you this, but that's what it looks like. Try and have a little tolerance and understanding for people. Everyone doesn't believe in the same thing. Everyone doesn't agree on every single little thing. You can't just shove your beliefs and opinions down someones throat unless you want to guarantee that they will rebel against you and your beliefs.
204 posted on 02/14/2002 10:09:47 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Some hope remaining.
Working parents should be able to leave the job if their child is sick, Cain said, but so should childless workers have opportunities to take personal time away for themselves as well.

Every company I have worked for or known about either lets an employee use SICK LEAVE to stay home and care for the child, or ALL employees get the same amount of PERSONAL DAYS OFF. In the case of sick leave, mothers often have to come to work sick in order to save their sick leave for a sick child. Childless people, therefore, have MORE time for themselves.

205 posted on 02/14/2002 10:09:58 AM PST by DallasDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Artie_Kay
M. Scott Peck said there are two reasons for marriage 1) procreation and 2) spiritual friction
(I love that idea . . .)
I think it also applies to children . . .I am very pro-children because I believe it is part of the natural spiritual purpose of our existence
obviously we no longer have to worry about our children taking care of us in our old age, Big Brother / Uncle Sam / the Village will do that . . .
but the growth that occurs as you develop the abilities to parent . . . I don't think that can be duplicated . . .I don't think there is anything as challenging
I was a "why bring children into this terrible world" type, thank god my husband was not . . .
there is absolutely nothing in life to compare with having children, but you won't know if you don't . . .
of course, I'll never know what it is like to be a totally self-centered child-LESS person,

THANK GOD!


206 posted on 02/14/2002 10:11:19 AM PST by mamaduck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hunyb, Aquinasfan
"i don't like you. just because i choose not to have a child, my marriage is meaningless?"

Speaking as one who's first child came unplanned and after 15 years of marriage, the "before days" were like a really really close and loving monogamous relationship with legal contractual and religious obligations. I imagine this is what the gay community is clamoring for. If that's how society's gonna see marriage, then why not let them have it?

Nowadays, we still have all of the above, but there's a purpose to our marriage that goes beyond ourselves. There's a wide-eyed beautiful curious mischievous living legacy now... He sings in his crib at 3 AM, and sometimes it makes us cry with joy. If people feel like I'm p!ssing on their barbeque simply for pointing this out, so be it.

Speaking from experience, the childless can enjoy theme parks and video games as much as anybody... but there's always the knowledge that these things were designed and built with kids in mind, as was marriage.

207 posted on 02/14/2002 10:11:34 AM PST by Harrison Bergeron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Well said.

I always wanted a big family but didn't meet my husband until I was in my late 30s. (He's in his 40s.) We're both committed Christians and neither of us had been previously married.

We decided before we were married that we would not have children. The main reason being that we just couldn't see ourselves at 60s with teenagers and in our 70s with college age young adults.

Between the two of us we have 9 nieces and nephews ranging from 1 month old to 14 years. We have set up education funds for each of them and contribute monthly with the intent of fully funding their educations ourselves. Nothing would give us more pleasure.

We travel extensively and plan to take each of them with us to Europe the summer that they turn 16. I can't tell you how much I'm looking forward to taking the first one next year for two weeks in London and Paris. I can't wait to visit the great museums and open up a whole new world of possibilities for her.

I adore my husband and had we met and married younger then things would probably be different. But I would rather spend the rest of my live devoting myself to my husband and his happiness than doing anything else I can think of.

208 posted on 02/14/2002 10:14:57 AM PST by ReaganGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: oremus
If there are some who are genuinely needy

If you can't afford 'em, don't pop 'em out.

209 posted on 02/14/2002 10:15:07 AM PST by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: oremus
Just curious - how does a couple know when they have had the obligatory quota of kids? Is it two, three or ten? As one preaching down to the rest of us on the topic, what's your score?
210 posted on 02/14/2002 10:16:51 AM PST by another1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
And would you care to guess why she refused to attend these things and where she got the instructions to not attend them because it would go against her religion??? I'll tell you where... HER PRIEST!

Odd and interesting. I've known a fair number of mixed marriages over the years. In only two cases were there issues raised. Both marriages were Christian-Jewish, and the objections came from the Jewish inlaws-to-be. The curiousity is that the parents themselves were totally secularized; their objection was a purely atavistic tribal thing.

211 posted on 02/14/2002 10:16:58 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Bump in the night
Another person with issues. I never said or did any of the things you accuse me of. I explain the faith to those who don't understand and suddenly I'm shoving it down people's throats. I don't think so. I am also very tolerant of where people are at, but I will call a lie for what it is. Truth is hard to swallow, and I can even understand that. It took me a long time.

In your world, tolerance applies to everyone EXCEPT Catholics and Christians (especially Catholics). I could easily turn what you said right around back at ya!

212 posted on 02/14/2002 10:17:47 AM PST by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: mamaduck
I'll never know what it is like to be a totally self-centered child-LESS person,

Just so we're clear on this...does that statement apply to ALL childless couples?

213 posted on 02/14/2002 10:21:13 AM PST by ReaganGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: oremus
THIS IS THE TRUTH, and spiritually it is a serious and dangerous matter, whether someone chooses to believe it or not.

Please, explain how this does not constitute shoving your beliefs down others' throats.

214 posted on 02/14/2002 10:22:16 AM PST by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Nea Wood
Boy, is THIS ever true. I've noticed it at every job I've ever had. The parents rush out the door at the dot of quitting time, while the childless employees are told, not asked, to work late. If you're childless, no excuse is good enough to get out of overtime. If you suggest that maybe the parents should do their share, they look at you as if you are a heartless monster. "But she's got to pick up her kids!!!!!!" Well, she chose to have kids. Maybe I've got something to do after work, too, something that may not involve kids, but is just as important to me.

Not to mention the maternity leave (six weeks with pay) at my company. Half of the women who have taken it have NOT returned to work afterwars, which in my eyes is criminal.

215 posted on 02/14/2002 10:23:31 AM PST by rogercolleridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #216 Removed by Moderator

To: another1
There's no quota, per say, but each marital act must be open to the transmission of life. It is morally acceptable to use nature's rhythms to avoid pregnancy during fertile times, as God created those same rhythms for a purpose. In this way, you do not shut out God and His Will completely (as with contra-ception). You say, "God, we feel we would rather not have another child at this time, BUT if YOU want us to have one, we will accept him/her lovingly from you." Each couple should prayerfully discern whether or not another child is what God is asking of them. Also to be taken into consideration can be finances (not speaking of selfishness or materialism), health, emotional state etc. etc. It's not about pumping out 12 kids like people mistakenly think. It's about keeping God in your marriage and the marriage act, not shutting him out.
217 posted on 02/14/2002 10:25:15 AM PST by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: oremus
Therefore, confession and a few Hail Mary's is no guarantee for heaven. Those conditions must be met.

Ahhhhh. Okey dokey. Well that's good to know, because that whole idea sounded pretty wacky to me. Thanks for clarifying!

218 posted on 02/14/2002 10:26:32 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
Asserting that something is the Truth, does not equate with "shoving it down people's throats". People are free to take it or leave it. You don't like it, move on.

BTW, what I say is not merely my own opinion.

219 posted on 02/14/2002 10:28:33 AM PST by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
If you can't afford 'em, don't pop 'em out

Rep. Howard Coble (R-NC) gave out bumper stickers on the campaign trail that read...

Can't Feed 'Em
Don't Breed 'Em

220 posted on 02/14/2002 10:29:06 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-308 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson