Posted on 02/13/2002 5:14:57 PM PST by kattracks
Capitol Hill (CNSNews.com) - The substitute campaign finance bill proposed by Reps. Christopher Shays (R-Conn.) and Martin Meehan (D-Mass.) is headed for a vote late Wednesday night or early Thursday morning, after two attempts to replace the bill failed.
But Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) is concerned about the constitutional implications and political ramifications of the bill, if it becomes law in its current form.
"This legislation tells democracy to shut up and sit down," said Hyde, arguing for an amendment to the Shays-Meehan substitute. "Political advocacy is strangled, not encouraged."
Hyde's amendment failed.
Now the nation's largest Second Amendment rights group says it is willing to go to court, if necessary, to preserve its First Amendment rights.
The National Rifle Association is one of many issue advocacy groups that have criticized the various versions of the Shays-Meehan bill, and its Senate companion McCain-Feingold, for infringing on the free speech and free association rights of its members.
"This legislation, in its latest of numerous incarnations, continues to contain provisions that would severely limit the ability of individual and like-minded Americans to participate in the legislative and political arenas, as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, while the big media conglomerates and politicians are exempted," the group said in a press release Wednesday.
At the heart of the NRA and other issue groups' contention with the bill is an "electioneering blackout" provision that would ban most third parties from using the name of a federal candidate for 30 days prior to a primary election and 60 days prior to a general election.
David Mason, the chairman of the Federal Election Commission (FEC) told CNSNews.com Wednesday that the provision is almost certainly unconstitutional and definitely unenforceable. He says such a "blackout" would only create a window for incumbents to introduce controversial legislation with little fear of criticism.
Issue advocacy groups could bypass the ruling by complying with new rules that would essentially force them to create Political Action Committees (PACs) and to disclose their contributors' names to the FEC. Opposing candidates and media outlets would be exempt from the regulations.
"Why are the First Amendment rights of the media more important than those of American citizens?" asked the NRA. "Where in the Constitution does it allow politicians to subvert the First Amendment?"
NRA chief lobbyist, James J. Baker, is equally upset about the process supporters used to bring Shays-Meehan up for a vote.
"We are amazed as Congress seeks to 'reform' the process and seeks more 'public disclosure,'" Baker said, "that the amendments that will be offered were not even made public until the night before votes would take place, less than 24 hours before the votes are cast."
Baker says the group is ready to act if the bill passes with the "electioneering blackout" in place.
"Regardless of the final disposition of the 'campaign finance reform' legislation," he said, "we have no choice but to unalterably oppose this sweeping attack on the First Amendment rights of all Americans."
NRA Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre says the group is willing to take whatever steps are necessary to protect the rights of gun owners to advocate for their political beliefs.
"Shays-Meehan attacks the very heart of the First Amendment. We will fight this infringement right up to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of all Americans," LaPierre added. "Fairness and free speech cannot be victims of politics."
E-mail a news tip to Jeff Johnson.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
Wasn't Ann Coulter threatening to run at one time. Is she in Shays' district?
When you have been a member for five years, I believe that you are entitled to vote for the directors who control the organization. I am looking forward to that time. Just as the red-zone will become more red with my arrival, the NRA will become more pro-Constitution when I have achieved voting status.
I don't believe that the economic troubles of K-Mart and Sara Lee, and the decline in the visibility of Rosie are just coincidence. I believe that the economic clout of gun-owners is an underestimated but very powerful tool for the preservation of our rights.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
Ditto!
I think you just did.
If you still want to make a wager on Bush NOT vetoing, I'll take the bet. (That is, if it comes to his desk the way it is now, without the banning of soft money being effective for this election).
Maybe she could "play it down" during the election for the vast unwashed.
Wouldn't it be fabulous to have her replace Shays? She's a bulldog! (I mean that as a compliment, of course!)
Oh, SCOTUS will get to it, after the appeals unless it somehow gets expedited to them. SCOTUS will overturn the bill.
The real hope of the supporters of the sham of a law only want to use it to get through this fall's election. And the NRA is their real target for silencing.
A person can always find more excuses to do nothing than to do something.
A person can always find more excuses to do nothing than to do something.
That pretty much sums it up. Before my life is out, in 30 years or so, my typing this sentence will result in the Thought Police coming to cart me away for a long interrogation on my AntiState Thought Crimes.
One can only hope so......however, if those two White House sources are to be relied upon and believed, the President may not veto, he may let it go to Supreme Court for overturning.....one can only hope it will do so.
Yeah....where's the big mouth ACLU? They're always sticking their noses where it doesn't belong.....why don't they champion real civil rights transgressions?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.