This article was the first one posted and it was from Kansas City TV5.
Go to TV5 Article
TroutStalker posted this article from the Kansas City Star
Go to Kansas City Star Article
Then the Tribune ran an editorial on the 8th discussed on this Earlier Tribune Editorial Thread
Then the AP had a story HERE
The KC Star ran additional articles on last Friday and Saturday with the Saturday article talking about the Wyandotte County Prosecutor looking into open meeting violations by the board members.
On Monday the 11th, the teacher was on The O'Reilly Factor on FoxNews.
The board has declined to change their small room venue for their monthly meetings so that teachers and the public can attend beyond the handful their current meeting room holds.
The local teacher's group has written letters to the board with import and responses unknown.
In short, the damage done by people holding a public office who don't understand how to perform the duties without being a pliebisitary delegate, responding to the momentary will of the people, mob rule and cronies, have taken a giant step toward permanent damage to a small suburban school district for no reason.
The editorial above doesn't strike at the number of the 90 honest students who got lower grades due to the change in weighting of the paper. For those with low exam scores or lower homework scores the truth was this: When it was 50% their good performance pulled up their grade more than it did when changed to 30%.
Exactly. However, this practice [plagiarism in school assignments] is widespread, even in college. I returned to college 5 years ago to finish my degree. Of course, plagiarism was strictly forbidden, but I found it to be rampant among some of the students; and it damaged the rest of us.
We had to work on a number of "group" projects, the object being to simulate the work environment and to produce a quality product without getting into a fight with our co-workers. I usually volunteered to type the projects, in addition to producing my own part, just to make sure that all of the formatting and footnoting was done properly. I always had someone in the group who wanted to copy 4 or 5 pages out of the text and pass it off as a "quote".
Since we were assigned a "group" grade for the projects (and turning in a plagiarized section would destroy my own grade), I had to find a way to correct and adapt this work without insulting my fellow student and still confrom to the guidelines of the instructor. My fellow students often claimed that they always got by with that practice and could see no reason for my cooncern, despite the University rules against it. That was the hardest part of returning to college. (I did graduate with the highest grade point in my program, despite being the oldest member of the class, however.)
Here is a slightly different description of what happened.