To: ArGee;*BRAAD;Khepera;EODGUY;1 FELLOW FREEPER
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?
4 posted on
02/13/2002 6:57:50 AM PST by
Dakmar
To: Dakmar
The court noted that the Constitution does not protect people from being offended by the opinions of others. Well, DUH! But you won't hear Liberals explaining it that way. To hear them tell it, if you suggest that SAD should remain a secret behind closed doors, or treated, then you are de-facto giving the thugs who beat Matthew Shepherd permission to do so.
I'm not sure which is a worse mental disorder, SAD (Same-sex Attraction Disorder) or LTD (Liberal Thinking Disorder).
Shalom.
6 posted on
02/13/2002 7:06:59 AM PST by
ArGee
To: Dakmar
This is a perfect illustration of why the NEA and the homosexual zealots are in dire need of heterosexual tolerance training, but school is not the forum for the discussion of sexuality.
The NEA should stick to teaching the three R's, if they can remember what they stand for.
13 posted on
02/13/2002 3:36:26 PM PST by
EODGUY
To: Dakmar
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?Go for it. This is outrageous.
To: Dakmar
I wonder if we can sue the NEA for corrupting minors?I don't know why they can't be charged criminally. If you or I showed other people's children the homosexual literature the NEA pushes on kids, I have no doubt the cops would be there in no time.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson