Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Plans Unprecedented Camera Network
REUTERS ^ | February 13, 2002 08:10 AM ET | Reuters

Posted on 02/13/2002 6:15:46 AM PST by goldylight

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Washington police are building what will be the nation's biggest network of surveillance cameras to monitor shopping areas, streets, monuments and other public places in the U.S. capital, a move that worries civil liberties groups, The Wall Street Journal said on Wednesday.

The system would eventually include hundreds of cameras, linking existing devices in Metro mass transit stations, public schools and traffic intersections to new digital cameras mounted to watch over neighborhoods and shopping districts, the Journal said.

"In the context of Sept. 11, we have no choice but to accept greater use of this technology," Stephen Gaffigan, the head of the police department project, told the Journal.

He said city officials had studied the British surveillance system, which has more than 2 million cameras throughout the country, and were "intrigued by that model."

One of the first uses of police surveillance cameras in Washington was April 2000, when authorities set up a network to monitor protests during a meeting of the International Monetary Fund and World Bank, the newspaper said.

On Tuesday morning, in response to the latest terror alert issued by the Justice Department, police activated a $7 million command center that was first used on Sept. 11. The command center, which has dozens of video stations for monitoring cameras, will remain in use until federal officials end the alert, the Journal reported.

Cameras installed by the police have been programmed to scan public areas automatically, and officers can take over manual control if they want to examine something more closely.

The system currently does not permit an automated match between a face in the crowd and a computerized photo of a suspect, the Journal said. Gaffigan said officials were looking at the technology but had not decided whether to use it.

Eventually, images will be viewable on computers already installed in most of the city's 1,000 squad cars, the Journal said.

The Journal said the plans for Washington went far beyond what was in use in other U.S. cities, a development that worries civil liberties advocates.

Barry Steinhardt, associate director of the American Civil Liberties Union in New York, noted there were few legal restrictions of video surveillance of public streets. But he said that by setting up a "central point of surveillance," it becomes likely that "the cameras will be more frequently used and more frequently abused."

"You are building in a surveillance infrastructure, and how it's used now is not likely how it's going to be used two years from now or five years from now," he told the Journal.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: billofrights; biometrics; privacylist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last
To: concerned about politics
Yesterday, you complained about bashing Clinton, and threatened to bash every Republican president you could think of if I didn't stop.

That's a lie. Post my comments if you dare. You can't because I have never taken up for Clinton. See you are such a liar that you need to make things up about those people that love their country (unlike you). You are just trying to scare people.

61 posted on 02/13/2002 6:51:18 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
"We'll go back to the way it was after the War. "

I've come to the conclusion that you are either being totaly sarcastic or you are a complete idiot.
This isn't a personal attack its just an observation.

62 posted on 02/13/2002 6:52:37 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
Orson Wells was a prophet.

George Orwell was pretty smart, too.

63 posted on 02/13/2002 6:53:19 AM PST by ProudGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
He's being sarcastic.
64 posted on 02/13/2002 6:53:54 AM PST by freeeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction
Oh here's another one out to bash our president. There's a war on because the President said there's a war on, or did you miss all those daisy cutters and Northern Alliance guys fighting for our freedom? P.S. The Constitution says that the President is the commander in chief of the armed forces or did you miss that part?
65 posted on 02/13/2002 6:54:28 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: dead
Kid. You obviously haven't reformed yourself.

Back to the Group W bench.

66 posted on 02/13/2002 6:54:39 AM PST by Mugwump
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
See you are such a liar that you need to make things up about those people that love their country (unlike you). You are just trying to scare people.

How old are you?

67 posted on 02/13/2002 6:54:59 AM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I think you mean George Orwell, but your point is right on.
68 posted on 02/13/2002 6:56:14 AM PST by NC_Libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
And many think that Islamic Laws requiring the wearing of a 'burka (sp?) as misguided...

Perhaps a new fashion trend is about to be launched...

69 posted on 02/13/2002 6:56:18 AM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
Read the Constitution. Especially about who has the power to declare war.

As for assertion that I'm bashing the President, you're making that up. Real close to a lie.

Go read the Constitution. Big words, but if you go slow.......(you can use your lips to mouth the words if that helps)

70 posted on 02/13/2002 6:57:08 AM PST by KirklandJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I love W!
71 posted on 02/13/2002 6:57:38 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
It was terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could igve you away.

Quite some time ago, Rush Limbaugh addressed this. There apparently is software available that can "read" the pupil of the eye. He predicted it would be used in the classroom to monitor students' reactions to the teachers' lessons. Scary, indeed!

72 posted on 02/13/2002 6:58:35 AM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Loopy
Congress alone is constitutionally invested with the power of changing our condition from peace to war," said Thomas Jefferson and Hamilton, who described the president's constitutional role of commander-in-chief of the army and navy as "nothing more than ... first General and Admiral" after Congress declares war.
73 posted on 02/13/2002 6:58:37 AM PST by goldylight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: boris
I would prefer to see surveillance of public places opened to the public, so, for example, you and I could data-mine the images to see how much time cops spend in donut shops, or how much time public works vehicles fit the description of "What's orange and sleeps five?"

All kidding aside, I think that without openness, we would get the same results as in the U.K.: Lots of cameras, but street crime goes up anyway.

74 posted on 02/13/2002 6:59:41 AM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
For a detailed map of all "traffic cameras" now being used
across this Nation, go here:

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficinfo/index.htm

The NYC system is quite elaborate and interesting!

Enjoy

 

75 posted on 02/13/2002 6:59:52 AM PST by Deep_6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction; francisandbeans
See if you can follow this. The President said we are at war. We went and bombed Afghanistan. We sent troops there. We sent the navy there. Then go back to point 2. The president said we are at war. So if YOU say we are not, you are saying something negative about our beloved president. Therefore, you are Bashing Bush. And you are aiding the terrorists.
76 posted on 02/13/2002 7:00:18 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
Oh my gosh! Shades of Max Headroom!
77 posted on 02/13/2002 7:00:20 AM PST by chouli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
"In the context of Sept. 11, we have no choice but to accept greater use of this technology," Stephen Gaffigan, the head of the police department project, told the Journal.

Don't you just love this lame Naziesque excuse, "We have no choice", oh really?

78 posted on 02/13/2002 7:00:47 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KirklandJunction;loopy;concerned about politics;at bay
I'd like to will enlighten those out of the "loop" to what loopy is doing on this thread.


79 posted on 02/13/2002 7:01:30 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: goldylight
What more can I say to your post other than that I've already said you are out to aid the terrorists. What are you saying about our beloved president? Our dear leader?
80 posted on 02/13/2002 7:01:50 AM PST by Loopy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 181-190 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson