Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: balrog666
Question (forgive me if this is a dumb one): I read this article as saying that the .45 holds seven rounds. Does this mean that the "high capactity" magazine ban did not affect .45's? In other words, it didn't make any difference because none of them were made for "high capacity" magazines anyway? If not-- if there are .45's that will accept a so-called "high capactity" magazine-- are they desirable? Ought one go ahead and get one now, while there are still pre-ban magazines available? If so, which one?
37 posted on 02/12/2002 11:51:20 AM PST by allthingsnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: allthingsnew
Para-Ordinance was the first to introduce a high capacity 1911. They made frames first and then the complete P14. At the intrduction, the High cap mags were 50 dollars each. That was before the ban. I saw one for sale at 135 dollars. For my 1911's, I use Wilson 8 shot mags which gives me 9 shots without the large bulky mag housing. I believe Kimber makes a model that takes 10+1. You might look at that.
40 posted on 02/12/2002 12:13:46 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: allthingsnew
Question (forgive me if this is a dumb one): I read this article as saying that the .45 holds seven rounds. Does this mean that the "high capactity" magazine ban did not affect .45's? In other words, it didn't make any difference because none of them were made for "high capacity" magazines anyway? If not-- if there are .45's that will accept a so-called "high capactity" magazine-- are they desirable? Ought one go ahead and get one now, while there are still pre-ban magazines available? If so, which one?

Sorry, but I don't have the foggiest. I suppose you could find a high capacity .45 magazine but I've never seen one that wasn't homemade. My guess is that it would stick out a long way and be rather inconvenient to handle.

Maybe someone else will provide an answer...
47 posted on 02/12/2002 1:18:57 PM PST by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: allthingsnew
I've got some 45 ACP 10rd magazines from Wilson Combat.

I believe they call them the "bureaucrat"...

48 posted on 02/12/2002 1:19:14 PM PST by eyes_only
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: allthingsnew
The standard .45 ACP model of 1911 will take an eight round mag, but it was designed for the seven rounder; the Paraordnance P14.45 had a 14 round capacity with its double-stack mag, now 'outlawed' by the stupid 1994 so-called 'crime bill' (the only real crime was the bill itself.); the Glock 21 has a 13 round standard mag, now only for law enforcement, unless you can find some old mags around prior to the 1994 stupid law.
60 posted on 02/12/2002 2:03:50 PM PST by 45Auto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: allthingsnew
If not-- if there are .45's that will accept a so-called "high capactity" magazine-- are they desirable? Ought one go ahead and get one now, while there are still pre-ban magazines available? If so, which one?

Sure, a number of makers put out a hicap 1911 clone. I have a S-V Infinity hicap, which is nicely made and accurate enough to use in my half-assed Bullseye shooting. Hicap mags for these guns are not a problem, they're available. The SVIs and STIs are quite expensive, but the mags are not.

76 posted on 02/12/2002 3:13:16 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson