Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: golitely
"You've essentially attacked the speculation that the family life is unhealthy and might have contributed to the child's disappearance."

I've done no such thing.

868 posted on 02/14/2002 7:44:09 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 866 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
From your post #492:

These people are normally heterosexuals who want to be promiscuous. There is really nothing "perverted" about their sexual preferences.

Immoral? Perhaps that would be a better word, as the problem with the actions of a swinging couple clash with Christian norms.

Ok, Luis, what are you saying here, then? That you think what this couple is doing is reprehensible, irresponsible, and likely contributory to the loss of their child? I re-read the post, and I don't see that. But then, perhaps you're using Clinton-speak, and the meaning of "is" and "nothing perverted" is up for debate.

870 posted on 02/14/2002 8:11:52 AM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson