These people are normally heterosexuals who want to be promiscuous. There is really nothing "perverted" about their sexual preferences.
Immoral? Perhaps that would be a better word, as the problem with the actions of a swinging couple clash with Christian norms.
Ok, Luis, what are you saying here, then? That you think what this couple is doing is reprehensible, irresponsible, and likely contributory to the loss of their child? I re-read the post, and I don't see that. But then, perhaps you're using Clinton-speak, and the meaning of "is" and "nothing perverted" is up for debate.
Exactly what is written. Do you have a comprehension problem? Oh! I get it! You are upset because I will NOT participate in mudslinging!
You want to call the van Dams "perverts"? Go ahead, I call them immoral, or sinners. I attack the sin, not the sinner.
"That you think what this couple is doing is reprehensible, irresponsible, and likely contributory to the loss of their child?"
No, that's what YOU think. I have yet to see anything that will convince me that their lifestyle had anything to do with Danielle being missing.
As a matter of fact, according to the news article posted on this thread, the lead investigator in the case has cleared all the people present at the van Dams on Friday and Saturday nights from any wrongdoing related to the alleged abduction.
Now, you don't want to question the statements of a responsible news reporter and a law enforcement officer (one who actually gives his name out) do you?