Skip to comments.
Peace in English, War in Arabic
The Boston Globe
| February 10, 2002
| Jeff Jacoby
Posted on 02/10/2002 8:14:53 PM PST by thoughtfully_conservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: thoughtfully_conservative
ping
2
posted on
02/10/2002 8:21:53 PM PST
by
ChadGore
To: thoughtfully_conservative
Arafat has demostrated his duplicity myriad times. We shouldn't trust a word he says. Or a word anybody of his ilk says. Does he think we don't listen to his Voice of Palestine broadcasts? Or maybe he thinks we don't have people that understand his biscuit-lipped slurred speech? Gads. What a maroon.
To: sabertooth,lent,fitz,dennisw
bttt
To: thoughtfully_conservative
When will Israel address the "Palestinian Question" once and for all, forcefully and logically?
To: thoughtfully_conservative; veronica
ping
6
posted on
02/10/2002 9:10:47 PM PST
by
Optimist
To: thoughtfully_conservative
But nowhere was mention made of Arafat's article in The New York Times, and his condemnation of terrorism was not translated into Arabic. Why would it be? It was intended strictly for the stupid American audience.
In international politics, Americans are like "Mikie": they'll believe anything.
Aside from that, if such a conciliatory message were translated and published in Arabic, someone might get hurt.
The best way to to know the genuine attitude of Arafat and Palestinians is to publish their daily domestic speeches. Fat chance.
To: thoughtfully_conservative
Where are all the Arafat behind smoochers on this forum now?
8
posted on
02/10/2002 9:25:42 PM PST
by
SkyPilot
To: thoughtfully_conservative
I think everyone now realizes that the duplicitous Arafat cannot be trusted. It has been suggested that he fears for his own life from the terrorists he has supported if he aids the Israelis in any way. He gets no sympathy from me if that is his position -- he is obviously not a strong enough ruler to control what he has helped to build.
The biggest problem is -- Who is next in line after Arafat? Apparently no one stands out as a leader who can be trusted.
To: thoughtfully_conservative
How through all those lonely lonesome years I has been tryin to TELL ya this, ...and now at last, I have some others who can do that job for me, and will say out loud what two-faces these pallies and mullahs are.
Now if we could just see every page 1 on Sunday paper, what they preached in Arabic in their mosques on the Temple Mount, or in Gaza or Ramallah, or Qom or Tehran, or Baghdad or Basra, or Damascus or Aleppo, or Beirut or Baalbek, on the previous Friday, .!!! That'll be the day!
Let me gives ya a hint: Our own govt. knows it is so inflammatory, they will not let it be published here for Americans to see.
10
posted on
02/10/2002 9:41:53 PM PST
by
crystalk
To: monkeyshine;catspaw
bump
11
posted on
02/10/2002 9:49:24 PM PST
by
d4now
To: BenF
fyi
12
posted on
02/10/2002 9:50:57 PM PST
by
d4now
To: crystalk
Let me gives ya a hint: Our own govt. knows it is so inflammatory, they will not let it be published here for Americans to see. No, I think the reason Bush has not emphasized Arafat's speaking with two tongues and Sharon has spoken to those other Palestinians is because they want to publicly give the Palestinians every inch of rope they possibly can, in preparation for the inevitable day when Arafat and his minions are militarily obliterated (the point being to condemn Arafat's two-facedness and the Palestinians' hopelessly terroristic attitudes LOUDLY and with overwhelming evidence to back it up, at exactly the right strategic moment).
To: Travis McGee
What? Arafat is a treacherous weasel?
14
posted on
02/10/2002 9:59:51 PM PST
by
Lent
To: d4now
Arafat needs to go...6 feet under or into a million bits -- but preferably both.
To: monkeyshine
6 feet under or into a million bitsWouldn't it be possible, in order to avoid any possibility of contamination, to jettison him away from our planet - so far that the gravitional pull would be so weak there wouldn't be any chance of re-entry?
But then there is vaporization. That wouldn't be so expensive.
16
posted on
02/10/2002 10:34:38 PM PST
by
d4now
To: thoughtfully_conservative
One day there will be a Palestinian leader who pleads for peace -- not just in English but in Arabic, too. When that day comes, it will be time to negotiate. Until then, it's war. Exactly right!
To: thoughtfully_conservative
"Peace in English, War in Arabic"Just like the old hippy icon Kully Kabrhan (sp).
18
posted on
02/10/2002 10:48:01 PM PST
by
fella
To: thoughtfully_conservative
"Let me be very clear. I condemn the attacks carried out by terrorist groups against Israeli civilians."
(Paraphrased) "Let me be very clear...I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky..."
I think maybe Yassir is taking tips from Clinton and Carville...
To: Frances_Marion
What I cannot understand is how so many American Jews can be liberal Democrats when it so patently clear that conservatives are vastly more pro-Israel. I am a Jew and a staunch conservative. And this paradox just baffles me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson