Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peace in English, War in Arabic
The Boston Globe | February 10, 2002 | Jeff Jacoby

Posted on 02/10/2002 8:14:53 PM PST by thoughtfully_conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2002 8:14:53 PM PST by thoughtfully_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
ping
2 posted on 02/10/2002 8:21:53 PM PST by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
Arafat has demostrated his duplicity myriad times. We shouldn't trust a word he says. Or a word anybody of his ilk says. Does he think we don't listen to his Voice of Palestine broadcasts? Or maybe he thinks we don't have people that understand his biscuit-lipped slurred speech? Gads. What a maroon.
3 posted on 02/10/2002 8:55:50 PM PST by cincinnati_Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sabertooth,lent,fitz,dennisw
bttt
4 posted on 02/10/2002 9:00:24 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
When will Israel address the "Palestinian Question" once and for all, forcefully and logically?
5 posted on 02/10/2002 9:05:06 PM PST by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative; veronica
ping
6 posted on 02/10/2002 9:10:47 PM PST by Optimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
But nowhere was mention made of Arafat's article in The New York Times, and his condemnation of terrorism was not translated into Arabic.

Why would it be? It was intended strictly for the stupid American audience.
In international politics, Americans are like "Mikie": they'll believe anything.

Aside from that, if such a conciliatory message were translated and published in Arabic, someone might get hurt.
The best way to to know the genuine attitude of Arafat and Palestinians is to publish their daily domestic speeches. Fat chance.

7 posted on 02/10/2002 9:12:36 PM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
Where are all the Arafat behind smoochers on this forum now?
8 posted on 02/10/2002 9:25:42 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
I think everyone now realizes that the duplicitous Arafat cannot be trusted. It has been suggested that he fears for his own life from the terrorists he has supported if he aids the Israelis in any way. He gets no sympathy from me if that is his position -- he is obviously not a strong enough ruler to control what he has helped to build.

The biggest problem is -- Who is next in line after Arafat? Apparently no one stands out as a leader who can be trusted.

9 posted on 02/10/2002 9:31:18 PM PST by bjcintennessee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
How through all those lonely lonesome years I has been tryin to TELL ya this, ...and now at last, I have some others who can do that job for me, and will say out loud what two-faces these pallies and mullahs are.

Now if we could just see every page 1 on Sunday paper, what they preached in Arabic in their mosques on the Temple Mount, or in Gaza or Ramallah, or Qom or Tehran, or Baghdad or Basra, or Damascus or Aleppo, or Beirut or Baalbek, on the previous Friday, .!!! That'll be the day!

Let me gives ya a hint: Our own govt. knows it is so inflammatory, they will not let it be published here for Americans to see.

10 posted on 02/10/2002 9:41:53 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine;catspaw
bump
11 posted on 02/10/2002 9:49:24 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenF
fyi
12 posted on 02/10/2002 9:50:57 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crystalk
Let me gives ya a hint: Our own govt. knows it is so inflammatory, they will not let it be published here for Americans to see.

No, I think the reason Bush has not emphasized Arafat's speaking with two tongues and Sharon has spoken to those other Palestinians is because they want to publicly give the Palestinians every inch of rope they possibly can, in preparation for the inevitable day when Arafat and his minions are militarily obliterated (the point being to condemn Arafat's two-facedness and the Palestinians' hopelessly terroristic attitudes LOUDLY and with overwhelming evidence to back it up, at exactly the right strategic moment).

13 posted on 02/10/2002 9:56:29 PM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
What? Arafat is a treacherous weasel?
14 posted on 02/10/2002 9:59:51 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: d4now
Arafat needs to go...6 feet under or into a million bits -- but preferably both.
15 posted on 02/10/2002 10:22:33 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
6 feet under or into a million bits

Wouldn't it be possible, in order to avoid any possibility of contamination, to jettison him away from our planet - so far that the gravitional pull would be so weak there wouldn't be any chance of re-entry?

But then there is vaporization. That wouldn't be so expensive.

16 posted on 02/10/2002 10:34:38 PM PST by d4now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
One day there will be a Palestinian leader who pleads for peace -- not just in English but in Arabic, too. When that day comes, it will be time to negotiate. Until then, it's war.

Exactly right!

17 posted on 02/10/2002 10:39:34 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
"Peace in English, War in Arabic"

Just like the old hippy icon Kully Kabrhan (sp).

18 posted on 02/10/2002 10:48:01 PM PST by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtfully_conservative
"Let me be very clear. I condemn the attacks carried out by terrorist groups against Israeli civilians."

(Paraphrased) "Let me be very clear...I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky..."

I think maybe Yassir is taking tips from Clinton and Carville...

19 posted on 02/10/2002 11:03:56 PM PST by Frances_Marion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frances_Marion
What I cannot understand is how so many American Jews can be liberal Democrats when it so patently clear that conservatives are vastly more pro-Israel. I am a Jew and a staunch conservative. And this paradox just baffles me.
20 posted on 02/11/2002 6:53:59 AM PST by thomas_1963
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson