Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Henrickson
It's not like they printed the whole thing and left out only the words, "Under God." That would be a different matter entirely.

So are you going to go after the makers and vendors of World War II newsreels that do precisely that? >:*3

Saying "One nation...indivisible" works as a self-contained phrase much better than "One nation, under God, indivisible" does. The latter requires a continuation for the prosody to work [unless one were to add a word to make it "One nation, under God and indivisible" which would be just plain ugly.

73 posted on 02/09/2002 4:20:53 PM PST by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
So are you going to go after the makers and vendors of World War II newsreels that do precisely that?

You can't leave out what isn't there. 'Under God' was not part of the pledge in WWII, although that straight arm salute which is so distasteful now was part of taking the pledge.

140 posted on 02/09/2002 11:03:03 PM PST by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

To: supercat
So are you going to go after the makers and vendors of World War II newsreels that do precisely that?

Funny you should mention that. A few months ago there was an outcry on FR about an old Looney Tunes short wherein Porky Pig recites the pre-1954 pledge. Even though he was old enough to know better, he swore that the short had been reedited to remove the words "under God". Others insisted the same thing.

151 posted on 02/10/2002 4:52:05 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson