Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bushies Target Hillary in Expanded Scandal Probe
Newsmax ^ | 2/9/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 02/09/2002 6:59:22 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-429 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The "Bushies"?... were did they come up with that address for the President and Family from Salon Magazine or Babs Streizand?...
101 posted on 02/09/2002 8:17:30 AM PST by arly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
Well, if they get nailed for something this 'small', and the proof is overwhelming, with photographic evidence, depositions, etc... then the american people would be in a better frame of mind to believe the REALLY bad things... thus furhter cementing the Clinton Stained Legacy into the minds of the voters... At least, I HOPE it works that way ;0)
102 posted on 02/09/2002 8:18:09 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A list of damages he released included:

They forgot "sticky residue in the Oval Office sink..."

103 posted on 02/09/2002 8:20:02 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
When will they give up on this?
104 posted on 02/09/2002 8:21:27 AM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LouD
IIRC, the sink was replaced...
105 posted on 02/09/2002 8:21:28 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: LouD
Actually, I wonder if they've just discovered that Hilliary! made off with some real national treasures (in terms of antiques and such) when she and Bubba absconded.
106 posted on 02/09/2002 8:22:12 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: illbenice
figure the odds, more likely this is to take our minds off all the corruption that is still being swept under the rug. name a one of the billyjeff E.O.s that was reviewed let alone reversed.
107 posted on 02/09/2002 8:22:23 AM PST by IRtorqued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: woofer
Yes, that's why I suggested it. ;-)
108 posted on 02/09/2002 8:22:35 AM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think GW held this "TRUMP CARD" until the Demorats started slinging mud (as he knew they would) The rats/liberal bias media are trying HARD to hang enron on the white house so this is payback. Good for GW!! Its about time!
109 posted on 02/09/2002 8:24:02 AM PST by cody32127
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom
Taking the high road is turning your back against crimes, especially crimes against our country?
110 posted on 02/09/2002 8:25:27 AM PST by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
Ditto! This one is petty stuff compared to the pardons. That one could have Hillary actively involved, and she needs to be humbled a little - by actually being held accountable for unlawful behavior!
111 posted on 02/09/2002 8:26:00 AM PST by John SBM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
The source is the GAO. The same group attacking the VP. I don't trust them. Read posts 10, 15, 21, 26, 30, 40 and 56.
112 posted on 02/09/2002 8:27:20 AM PST by ao98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
WTs
113 posted on 02/09/2002 8:28:46 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
I thought the bitch had an office in the West Wing.

Nope! Al Gore won on this one. Remember when she threw a lamp at Clinton?
I think it was because she didn't get her office in the West Wing. ;-)

114 posted on 02/09/2002 8:29:07 AM PST by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"White House folks suggested we cast as wide a net as possible," GAO director Bernard Ungar told the New York Daily News Saturday, adding that the Bushies wanted to redirect the probe's previous focus from the Eisenhower office building to Mrs. Clinton official digs.

Two questions :

1. He is a crdible source because................?

2. What is the purpose of telling this to the newspapers?

[both rhetorical questions, BTW]

President Bush has gone out of his way to accommodate those on the other side of the aisle. I find it hard to believe he would be so stoooooooopid as to say "Hey, we want to go after Hillary Clinton. Let's target her!"

Me thinks it is another smear attempt on the part of certain partisans to trash the President of the United States. Mighty fishy......the story, not Hillary. Well the story AND Hillary - can't forget ole' Crusty.

115 posted on 02/09/2002 8:29:30 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet; broomhilda
**Ping**
116 posted on 02/09/2002 8:29:40 AM PST by TwoStep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Ya mean that picture of Her Heinous leaving the White House with the silverware on the inside of her coat wasn't a fake?
117 posted on 02/09/2002 8:30:03 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
"The Clinton probe could prove distracting to Walker's focus in recent weeks: prying loose White House records on meetings between Vice President Dick Cheney and Enron officials."

Nothing would suprise me from that trash in the White House. Why has no proof been offered to show maintainance records of the damage? Did the RNC give out talking points for those who don't have time to "think"?

118 posted on 02/09/2002 8:30:20 AM PST by Abbalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
See post 36.
119 posted on 02/09/2002 8:31:27 AM PST by willieroe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: ao98
The source of this is the GAO. I don't trust most of the comments said by that agency.

That is wise. I worked there, briefly, during the Bush Sr. Administration. Beyond one other fellow conservative, virtually everyone I knew there was a lib.

I remember getting grief over wearing an Adam Smith necktie when interviewing some Executive Branch people. I was told that I was "signalling my willingness to collude" with the Administration. Then there was the time, after the "Multicultural Diversity Fashion Show," when I was accused of insensitivity for commenting that it was probably not appropriate to wear what looked like one's bathrobe to the office.

Virtually everyone there was a liberal with a large axe to grind.

120 posted on 02/09/2002 8:32:19 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 421-429 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson