Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
See post 36.
119 posted on 02/09/2002 8:31:27 AM PST by willieroe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: willieroe
Salon.com........now there is a credble source.

from the article.........

Rep. Bob Barr, R-Ga., the ardent Clinton foe who requested the GAO review, has tried to interpret the agency's findings to mean no "record of damage" had been compiled, not that no damage had occurred. But the lack of records "cataloging" any damages -- which Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer promised in January the White House would compile -- would seem to suggest one thing: Widespread acts of vandalism never occurred...........

My memory is vague, but I do seem to remember it was a half-assed investigation by the GAO. Of course, Bob Barr's motivation was in his role as an ardent Clinton foe. Gee, that was a "fair & balanced" article. Why the hell do I watch Brit Hume when I have Salon?

The NY Daily News article has McAuliffe, Carville, Begala's style stamped all over it. It is a plant designed to divide and conquer (read some of these posts) and get Bush's poll numbers down.

The next thing will be a push poll and the results will be heralded as "99% think President Bush is a liar."

The sad part is there are many Americans who are so stupid as to fall for it hook, line & sinker.

138 posted on 02/09/2002 8:51:27 AM PST by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson