Replies

I get the feeling there was more to this anger from Morris. We rarely know what goes on outside of what appears on TV.

The anger probably came from continualy being cut off in mid-sentence. It's hard to have a civil discussion with someone when one party keeps talking over you or cutting you off before you have had time to finish your point.

I think that the TRIGGER for his rage was the fact that she had OBVIOUSLY done her homework on his ACTUAL role with Clinton..."You were not really in the administration, were you?, you were just a poll taker for him, right?"..He turned white...stuttered, then said.."Well, it's true, I did not have security clearance, but the first 2 years I was sooo close to him, even Stephanopolis says I WAS the President!!!!!!" She came back with "Yes, and you never sat in on meetings with him and Albright, correct?" So this is what REALLY got him FIRED UP WITH VINDICTIVE RAGE toward her.

"The anger probably came from continualy being cut off in mid-sentence. It's hard to have a civil discussion with someone when one party keeps talking over you or cutting you off before you have had time to finish your point."

That tactic is straight out of The Feminista Playbook. I started noticing it being implemented back in the mid-1980s. In its original form, it consisted of simply talking over the other side, without raising the voice, as if the other side was silent and listening. Ideally the other side will raise his voice, as the feminista continues on and on and on, not so much as acknowledging that the other side is talking (let alone acknowledging that he is protesting being interrupted and steamrollered!)

It's one of the fouler "debating" tactics, and has unfortunately taken root and spread like cancer over the years.