Posted on 02/06/2002 4:56:47 PM PST by gg188
I searched for keyword, "Exposed", and couldn't find where this site had been referenced before.
I have not read all of the items on this web site by any means. But what I have read rings true and realistically agrees with the reality we see before our own eyes.
Islam: a religion of peace---who you gonna believe, them or your lying eyes?
Thankfully there are a few people out there not so intimidated by political correctness that they deny history and reality. I hope that FR can be a forum to get the truth out before it is too late.
(There's a lot more of interest on this site as well.)
No organized group currently worships the demon moloch.
Let that someday be just as true for the demon allah.
So if a lie is nicely written will you believe it?
This hangup on the word "Allah" is about the strangest thing I think I have ever seen.
Here's the deal guys - different languages have different words for "god". There's no particular "magic" or lack of same in any of these words. Thinking that the use of a word "binds" God or calls forth demons is a base superstition!
The last thing our foreign policy needs at the moment is guidance from folks who are into pagan cult beliefs.
I am sure many 'normal' practices in the US would seem bizarre to Muslims. Cultures differ and I think we should respect other cultures. I am sure it would look strange to them that people put trees in their houses in December, put lights all around it, and then tell children that some fat person in a red suit with a sled and reindeer comes down the chimney and delivers presents. It would seem strange to them that we sit on a toilet rather than the more natural, easier method of squatting.
The only problem that I have with Islam is the imperative to spread it around.
Good writing doesn't guarantee credibility, but bad writing undoubtedly undermines it.
Does the President intend that to be a statement of fact or a command to the Muslim nations that they can voluntarily be peaceful or else we will make them peaceful?
Is Bush saying that anyone or any nation that isn't peaceful is not, by definition, Muslim? We're not killing Muslims, we're killing terrorist, who by definition can't be true believers because they are not peaceful.
I tell my dog he is a "good boy" even though I know he isn't. And I swat him with a newspaper when he isn't.
We have little in common with China except Happy Meal toys, and even less in common with the Muslim world. We're bound for confrontation.
I understand exactly what you are saying here.
But you clearly have misunderstood me.
This isn't a quibble over the meaning of various words used to identify 'God'. The word 'allah' could have been a synonym for 'God', just as 'Yahweh' or 'Jehovah' are, IF the identity of the being called 'allah' were the same as the God identified by those names.
No, this isn't a turf battle over whose language we'll use to name 'God'... This is a dispute over what manner of being the thing moslems call 'allah' is.
I'm of the opinion that 'allah' is no more 'God' than my car's muffler is.
I believe that the being commonly called 'allah' is a demon. Not Satan, mind you, but one of his minions. I do not believe that 'allah' is merely the third aspect of a tripartite view of 'God' (Jew-Christian-Moslem) as is commonly believed by many westerners.
(I take it that this is your interpretation, that the moslem's 'allah' is the same God who is worshipped by Jews and Christians.)
If you'd like to pursue this line of thought you will find that it's not something idiosyncratic to me. There are places you can go, and sources you can refer to.
Don't presume to impose on me to function as a private tutor in this regard. I have no particular interest in whether or not this person or that one comes to a similar conclusion as I have on this subject.
The truth is out there. If you would find it, you'll need to want it badly enough to search out on your own.
Maybe for you. I evaluate the statements solely on the base of their content and not by the apearance.
Isn't it amazing how some can be in total denial about this, despite 1300 years of history? It's like, if it didn't happen in THEIR lifetime---the sixties or seventies or eighties---then it can't be REAL.
OUR lifetimes are the historical anomoly vis-a-vis Islam--a lull after the defeat of the Ottoman Turks early in the 20th century and before the terrorism of the last half of the century. People had better take a broader view of history than just their own little window or time-frame.
Take care...
I noticed immediately that English is not his native language. I disagree that he is "intelligent" however. Thoughts rush around in his brain as in a maelstrom, and he splashes them on the page without pausing for a moment's reflection.
I like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.