[_Jim]

I know it's difficult for some of you to grasp the facts of situation and the actions one may take in light of, say a 1) dynamic threat (as at Rubt Ridge) versus 2) a static case (as we have here) and the outright condemnation and sentencing without benefit of a trial and the airing of the evidence ... but *please* try.

Was your reply, 'Wm Bach', an attempt to justify the speaking for God or to justify the condemning and sentencing outside of a lawful trial?

[Wm Bach]

Was your reply, 'Wm Bach', an attempt to justify the speaking for God or to justify the condemning and sentencing outside of a lawful trial?

Neither. I know that it's difficult for you to grasp, but it's ShadenFreudelicious to observe the attempt anyway - those pudgy fingers all wiggling vainly in the air...