[Rain-maker]

I make NO descision, get it?! Like Switzerland I remain neutral since I don't have the physique to encapisulate the full dimensions of child rearing.

Funny you want to paint me as as pro-choice when I made no vote on the subject....LOL

[homeschool mama]

OT: what does your screen name mean? Is it a Burt Lancaster wannabee type thingymabob? Just curious.

[J.R.R. Tolkien]

Okey-dokey, Neville Chamberlain. Babies are just another Czechoslovakia. Your "neutrality" will secure "peace in our time"?

Plus ca change, plus c'est le meme chose.

2002, 1938.

You have no understanding of what it means to be a man.

We protect innocents. It's what we do. Abandon that, and you're nothing at all.

[Deb]

Apparently you don't understand the democratic process. You see our Constitution now allows women to vote for people who are called "representatives". These represenatives then go to Washington where they make legislation that produces laws under which we live. Women may vote for whomever they choose, so you see, it is possible for a woman to vote for a man to represent her and that man may then vote for or against abortion legislation. If the representative votes in a way which displeases that woman, she may then vote against him.

Unfortunately, no one elected the Supreme Court which has created a law that allows self-centered or ignorant women to murder their own children. This law flies in the face of the will of the majority of American women who oppose the murder of over a million unborn children a year.

Hope this helps.

[Nick Thimmesch]

Wow: I had no idea Freepers were so (rightfully) pro-life, but it has been an incredible thread!