Clearly, we didn't make love or PEACE to the terrorists in Afghanistan. In fact, if I'm not mistaken, we gave them... hmmm... 'war'.
But, remember, people, WAR IS PEACE.
Given the above and their numerous other merits, I propose that Bush/Blair are also nominated for Miss Teenage U.S.A., the best/worst dressed men, at the top of Schindler's list and Dogs of the Year.
Would all of you who keep making this statement have preferred that President Bush lobbed a few cruise missiles into an empty aspirin factory and called it a day? Perhaps he should have gone the "appeasement for peace" route?
None of you who are saying this can truly understand the nature of the foe we are trying to deal with, if you really believe that swift reprisal for the atrocities of September 11 disqualifies President Bush from winning a Nobel Prize for Peace.
Clinton's attempt at the Peace Prize: appeasement of Palestinians in the Mideast lead to a highly successful reign of terror, by individuals calling themselves "freedom fighters", for the past year and a half, with no end whatsoever in sight. Sure, appeasement worked MUCH better.