Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Reilly: Bush Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers
NewsMax ^ | February 3, 2002 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 02/03/2002 4:14:41 PM PST by MeekOneGOP

NewsMax.com

 

Sunday, Feb. 3, 2002 11:51 a.m. EST

O'Reilly: Bush Justice Dept. Hamstringing Pardongate Probers

Investigators with the office of the U.S. Attorney for New York's Southern District are being actively discouraged from pursuing evidence of criminal wrongdoing in the Clinton Pardongate scandal, with one insider charging that any prosecutor who tries to build a case against the former first family may actually hurt his career.

So says Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly, who made the startling cover-up allegation in his column this weekend.

"Although the Justice Department continues to say the probe is 'on the front burner', agents have told me there is little incentive to get things done," the Fox News commentator claimed. "In fact, one investigator said, if you push too hard on the case, you could find yourself in Fargo, N.D."

O'Reilly suggested that the Justice Department's go-slow regimen for probing the Clintons final White House scandal was likely instigated by the Bush White House.

"George W. Bush understands the way the game in Washington is played. You must make 'accommodations.'..... And what Bush may have given the Democrats is the assurance that he will not embarrass their party by aggressively pursuing the Marc Rich pardon investigation."

The first sign of Justice Department footdragging emerged last year, when New York attorney Ed Hayes, whose client Garland Lincecum had given prosecutors damaging evidence implicating former first brother Roger Clinton in Pardongate wrongdoing, expressed doubts about the probe.

In comments covered exclusively by NewsMax.com, Hayes told WABC radio's John Batchelor and Paul Alexander last June:

"The big issue now is does the government want to press the case. Because, for one thing, to really show whether or not there was a crime committed, you really have to question Bill Clinton. You really have to ask, 'Did Roger talk to his brother Bill about getting a pardon for Garland? Did Roger talk to anybody about getting a pardon for Garland?'"

Bill Clinton still has yet to testify. Even back then Hayes suggested that probers were being reined in on orders from Washington.

"You never know in these cases how dedicated they are to making the case. ... I think [lead Pardongate prober] Elliot Jacobson is a very conscientious prosecutor. But he does what he can do within the Justice Department."

Hayes hinted a political deal was already in the works: "You don't know whether [the Bush administration] is going to trade three federal judicial appointments in return for turning a blind eye to this." (See: Bush Justice Department Putting the Brakes on Pardongate Probe?)

O'Reilly now agrees, positing that Bush will reactivate the Clinton probe only if the GOP regains control of the Senate or if "things get rough."

"The Marc Rich pardon deal can always be used as a threat," he concluded.

Read Bill O'Reilly's full column on the Pardongate cover-up in NewsMax.com's magazine.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Bush Administration
Clinton Scandals
Pardongate
Sen. Hillary Clinton


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
Easy Link
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/2/3/105605
1 posted on 02/03/2002 4:14:41 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
two problems...Newsmax is not credible very much and O 'Reilly always uses them as a source
2 posted on 02/03/2002 4:18:44 PM PST by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALL
Bill Clintoon: Building a legacy. . .










3 posted on 02/03/2002 4:19:33 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Just what the heck is going on with the many 'investigations?
Who took over for Mary Jo Whitewater?
We never hear a word about the hundreds of 'illegal pardons'.
Never in the history of this Country has a President issued hundreds of pardons on the last day of his presidency.

I had hoped that Bush would bring us some justice.......after eight long years of suffering!

4 posted on 02/03/2002 4:34:37 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: MeeknMing
essentially, Bush is obstructing justice
6 posted on 02/03/2002 4:38:42 PM PST by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I'm afraid that this doesn't surprise me. But it does make me sick.

George Bush has no business going after clinton personally with a vindictive vendetta, which is exactly the way clinton would have behaved. But he also has no business hamstringing the prosecutors. He should put good prosecutors into office, get out of the way, and let them do their job.

7 posted on 02/03/2002 4:48:22 PM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
What in the hell are they doing? They have to stop Hillary now.
8 posted on 02/03/2002 4:51:02 PM PST by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I love Pres. Bush, but this stuff makes me angry. I read or heard on T.V. a week or so ago that they had finally discovered all of Al Gore's missing e-mail, but nothing more has been said about it!!
9 posted on 02/03/2002 4:52:09 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing; Donald Stone; OKCSubmariner; Askel5
Not much discussion.

Marc Rich Criminal Indictment

RICH WAS SPY FOR ISRAEL

Russians buy Marc Rich operation/and/Reports tie Marc Rich to Russian Spies

WHAT MARC RICH DID

Billionaire Marc Rich Pardoned... Why?

An Indefensible Pardon

Marc Rich and the Rothchild Bank

"We’re going to go after all crime, and we’re going to make sure people get punished for the crime."
George W. Bush - Presidential Debate at Wake Forest University - Oct 11, 2000

"It is not possible to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed' while deliberately violating the law.."
John Ashcroft - Aug. 1, 1998 (Washington Post).

Criminal Laws Implicated by the Clinton Scandals
OVER 2,000 PEOPLE, ORGANIZATIONS, AND CRIMES CONNECTED TO THE CLINTONS
Bush Justice Department Seeks to Halt Wen Ho Lee Testimony
Bush vows to review Clinton's actions, But Can't Find A Thing
BUSH JUSTICE DEPARTMENT BLOCKS RENO DEPOSITION
Bush Limits Access to Reagan Papers, Draws Criticism
Does Ashcroft Know About Miquel Rodriguez and Vincent Foster?
Ashcroft Orders Full FBI Review And Then The FBI Terrorists Can Proceed As Normal
Ashcroft Winding Down Justice Department Chinagate Probe
Breaking: US Congress Subpoena Orders Ashcroft To Release Clinton Evidence on Sept. 11, 2001
Bush action gives safe harbor to FBI 'terrorists'
DOJ Under Janet Ashcroft - Has Anything Changed?



10 posted on 02/03/2002 4:55:01 PM PST by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch
Yes, hundreds of missing e-mails were found......thanks to the effort of Judical Watch.........the only one who seems to keep the ball rolling.......despite all of the bashing JW receives, I still back them!
11 posted on 02/03/2002 4:56:43 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Beltway politics stink.
Bush has to "play the game."
I don't understand all of it, but hate it. . .
12 posted on 02/03/2002 4:59:50 PM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
utter nonsense...Mary Joe White has shown she doesn't give a rip...blame her, not Bush. Bush has not been overly helpful...and this is a strike against him. But, this is nonsense that somehow he is forcing them to stop work. come on.
13 posted on 02/03/2002 5:03:12 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Did I read somewhere, actually many months ago, that Bill/Hill have something on Dubya, and that's why he's dragging DOJ's feet? Something on Judicial Watch website that I could never find? Anybody know anything about this?
14 posted on 02/03/2002 5:07:08 PM PST by smileee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mickie; doug from upland:
I'm for Judicial Watch, but it seems to take them forever to accomplish things - but that's the government working against them. I kind-of feel that Bush is trying to keep the Democrats from delving into something about his father?!
15 posted on 02/03/2002 5:07:51 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
bump
16 posted on 02/03/2002 5:09:59 PM PST by GrandMoM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Yes, let us blame anyone but.........God forbid, Bush!

Ever hear Truman's old saying.....The buck stops here?

17 posted on 02/03/2002 5:14:00 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mickie
I have it written down in my 'trusty' little notepad; Judge James Comey will continue Mary Jo Whites probe on the Clinton pardons!!! Nothing more has been said about that either!
18 posted on 02/03/2002 5:14:51 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I'm not saying this story is untrue-- because I don't know, but I am saying that Newsmax is not a news source to rely on.
19 posted on 02/03/2002 5:25:18 PM PST by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
I'm afraid that this doesn't surprise me. But it does make me sick.

George Bush has no business going after clinton personally with a vindictive vendetta, which is exactly the way clinton would have behaved. But he also has no business hamstringing the prosecutors. He should put good prosecutors into office, get out of the way, and let them do their job.


excellent post
I agree with you perfectly
however Pardons are Constitutional
I am far more upset about the massive law-breaking clinton did and had done while he was in power
which is not being investigated at all
I too don't know the reason for it, I suspect the decision to sweep all clinton corruption under the rug
comes from a GOP desire not to turn off voters, and ensure GOP getting elected
The GOP has free will to do what it wants, but I won't vote for it again because of this
Love, Palo
20 posted on 02/03/2002 5:27:09 PM PST by palo verde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson