Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: notpoliticallycorewrecked
Let's face it guys, we would support him on the war on terror, just as the Dems are doing. We would support his handling of the war, but not on his domestics. Don't you think?
61 posted on 02/03/2002 10:21:23 AM PST by walrus954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: walrus954
I would support gore on the war if he did it right but he wouldnt he would go through the un way to much and there would be no ground troops on the ground in afghanistan and iraq wouldnt be worried as they are now
64 posted on 02/03/2002 10:24:38 AM PST by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: walrus954
Let's face it guys, we would support him on the war on terror, just as the Dems are doing. We would support his handling of the war, but not on his domestics. Don't you think?

You're assuming he'd wage a real war on terror. I have my doubts.

71 posted on 02/03/2002 10:27:52 AM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: walrus954
No, because Gore wouldn't have gone to war. We wouldn't have any thing of value to support. He (Gore) might go so far as toasting a few camels like BillyBob did, but he doesn't have the necessary male parts to do what Bush did.
72 posted on 02/03/2002 10:28:42 AM PST by notpoliticallycorewrecked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson