Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^ | 02/03/2002 | Damien McElroy

Posted on 02/02/2002 4:21:59 PM PST by Pokey78

A DECISION by President Bush to suspend £24 million of United States funding to a United Nations body accused of assisting forced abortions in China is threatening to cloud his visit to Beijing this month.

By withholding the money from the UN Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA), Mr Bush has made clear his opposition to China's extreme population control methods. Beijing is hoping to extend the controls, which restrict the majority of couples to one child, for another generation.

Beijing is furious with Mr Bush, who has been swayed by reports implicating the UNFPA in abuses of the one-child policy. China's foreign ministry told The Telegraph that the US had not made the "correct choice".

"The allegations by some American congressmen on the UNFPA's support for China's forced abortion and sterilisation operations is totally groundless," said a spokesman. "Some Americans, acting regardless of the facts, have lobbied for the US to cancel its donation to the UNFPA. This is with ulterior intentions, and is unfavourable for international co-operation in population control."

Allegations about UNFPA collusion with Chinese officials responsible for forcing women to terminate unauthorised pregnancies came late last year from the Population Research Institute (PRI), an American right-to-life research group.

Scott Weinberg, the PRI director of government affairs, conceded, however, that the administration would suffer a backlash from the powerful pro-China lobby if Mr Bush criticised the one-child policy while visiting the country.

"If Bush makes the UNFPA issue into a question of China's one-child policy and into an attempt to reform Communist China, then we lose, because the China lobby is too powerful here," he said. "Bush would never bring up UNFPA publicly, and highly unlikely privately, during such a trip." Conservative members of the US Congress note that the President did not mention the issue on a trip to Shanghai in October. His decision on January 12 to halt UNFPA funding has angered China, however, and is set to inject a sour note into this month's visit, starting on February 21.

The trip has been portrayed by Beijing as marking the 30th anniversary of Richard Nixon's groundbreaking visit to China in 1972.

The PRI has campaigned to persuade Congress that the UN agency is ineligible for US financing because it supports abortion services abroad. US law prohibits grants of federal funds to any organisation involved in providing abortions overseas, and Mr Bush, in one of his first official acts, made clear that he - unlike President Clinton - would respect the restriction.

A PRI researcher, Josephine Guy, recently visited China incognito and claims to have witnessed a forced abortion in a county designated as a model family planning regime by the UNFPA.

Ms Guy gained access to Sihui county's family planning bureau to photograph the local UNFPA desk. At a local hospital later, she interviewed a 19-year-old woman minutes before family planning officials took her behind a curtain to perform a termination. "Would she like to keep her baby?" Ms Guy asked the teenager's friends as she was led away. "Oh, yes," came the reply, "but the law forbids it."

Steve Mosher, the head of the PRI, said the photographs and testimony obtained by Ms Guy proved that the UN body was violating its pledges not to assist abortion programmes. "The UNFPA has repeatedly been caught promoting abortion and sterilisation under circumstances where informed consent is lacking, and even outright coercion is involved," he said.

A report issued by his group included pictures of houses that had been demolished by Chinese family planning officials in retaliation for the occupants' refusal to abide by the one-child policy.

Sarah Craven, of the UNFPA Washington office, said the agency had negotiated with the Chinese for two years to ensure that its county programmes were not tainted by the zealotry or malpractice common in the implementation of the one-child policy.

"Our main goal is to show the Chinese that they can meet demographic goals without resorting to human-rights violations or coercion," she said.

In the drive to stabilise China's population at 1.6 billion by 2050, there have been millions of victims. Besides ordering abortions and sterilisations, family planning officials often grow wealthy from fines levied on people with no chance of legal redress.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; mosher; poporg; populationcontrol; populationinstitute; populationresearch; pri; stevermosher; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 02/02/2002 4:21:59 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Sorry he gave them what they wanted the most "Normal trade relations "status

I am glad that he at least did this..but he should have done both

No roses for this common sense decision

2 posted on 02/02/2002 4:25:51 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Someone run over to the DU and tell ASKEL5.
3 posted on 02/02/2002 4:27:58 PM PST by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UN_List

UN_List: for United Nations articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register

Don't forget UN International Conference on Financing
 for Development
in Monterrey, March 18-22


4 posted on 02/02/2002 4:29:57 PM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Interesting that China thinks it is entitled to US taxpayer dollars ... so it can curb its own population.
5 posted on 02/02/2002 4:32:14 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
This is hogwash! This sum of money out of the favorable trade deficit China has with us wouldn't even pay a month's interest. This is a journalist expressing his desires and using the Chinese as an excuse to criticize Bush and push the abortion position.
6 posted on 02/02/2002 4:32:55 PM PST by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ms. Antifeminazi; MHGinTn
Badabump
7 posted on 02/02/2002 4:34:51 PM PST by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Why not? They felt entitled to US tax payer funded military info., congressmen, and at lesat one President?
8 posted on 02/02/2002 4:35:27 PM PST by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
Lets do more to piss off the Chinese. Lets take away their trade status.
9 posted on 02/02/2002 4:36:26 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
TS to Beijing.

Forcing an abortion on a woman is beyond barbaric.

10 posted on 02/02/2002 4:40:08 PM PST by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
China is furious as Bush halts UN 'abortion' funds

Tough beans!!! We shouldn't be funding abortions anyway. I doubt there are many American's who want there tax dollars to go to forced abortions.

11 posted on 02/02/2002 4:40:33 PM PST by MsLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeywrench
LOL, sad but true. Kind of like feeding a 'gator. Sooner or later he just demands it.
12 posted on 02/02/2002 4:42:36 PM PST by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
Come on RnMomof7, when I first heard this news I immediately thought of you! I was hoping you be just a tad more encouraged. Here's hoping for the best.......
13 posted on 02/02/2002 4:43:44 PM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LibKill
Nevermind that they're forcing a woman to have an abortion with American tax dollars.

But hey, if they want to deal with their over-population problem, then I say the U.S. should help them out. And all it'd take to solve their problem is a fistful of nukes...
14 posted on 02/02/2002 4:44:19 PM PST by Green Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78;
Beijing is furious with Mr Bush

Waaaaaaaaaa! Sniff...how can we ever recover???

15 posted on 02/02/2002 4:44:30 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I am glad that Bush did this. Why does ANY country think they're entitled to U.S. money, but especially for something so blatantly wrong?
16 posted on 02/02/2002 4:44:58 PM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
BUMP!

Can you ping the abortion and prolife list? How do you do that?

17 posted on 02/02/2002 4:45:28 PM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SpookBrat;*Pro life;*Abortion_list
Just put their names in the to: field like this.
18 posted on 02/02/2002 4:51:46 PM PST by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
China is nothing more than a very large third world nation......
19 posted on 02/02/2002 4:54:27 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hove
Taking handouts from a superpower.....
20 posted on 02/02/2002 4:55:54 PM PST by hove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson