Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re-runs of "Roots"
January 30, 2002 | Thomas Sowell

Posted on 01/30/2002 1:30:56 AM PST by TopQuark

Re-runs of "Roots"
Thomas Sowell Thomas Sowell

 

http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com -- "ROOTS" was the only book I knew my teenage son to read, aside from assigned school books, computer manuals and chess books. He was thrilled to receive a copy autographed by Alex Haley, courtesy of George Haley, his brother, whom I had met.

Alex Haley himself I never really met, though I saw him in person once because we went to the same barber in Los Angeles. Both then and in his television appearances, Alex Haley seemed like a very decent man. That is why it is especially painful to have to recognize, now that the television series based on "Roots" is going to be re-run on its 25th anniversary, that its enormous success a quarter of a century ago was a tragedy for blacks and for American society in general.

Why a tragedy? The short answer is what Winston Churchill said during World War II: "If the past sits in judgment on the present, the future will be lost." Some disastrous policies had been followed in the years leading up to World War II, and Churchill had sharply criticized those policies at the time but, now that the war was on, looking back could only interfere with the life-and-death job at hand.

There are some very big jobs at hand for black America -- and looking back at centuries past is a costly distraction from the work that needs to be done here and now. Moreover, the past that people are looking back at in "Roots" is not a wholly real past. When challenged by professional historians, Alex Haley called his work "faction" -- part fact and part fiction. He said that he had tried to give his people some myths to live by.

It was not that "Roots" merely got some details wrong. It presented some crucially false pictures of what had actually happened -- false pictures that continue to dominate thinking today.

"Roots" has a white man leading a slave raid in West Africa, where the hero Kunta Kinte was captured, looking bewildered at the chains put on him as he was led away in bondage. The village elders were likewise bewildered as to what these white men were doing, carrying their people away. In reality, West Africa was a center of slave trading before the first white man arrived there -- and slavery continues in parts of it to this very moment.

Africans sold vast numbers of other Africans to Europeans. But they hardly let Europeans go running around in their territory, catching people willy-nilly.

Because of the false picture of history presented by "Roots" and by other sources, last year we had the farce of the president of Nigeria making demands on the United States because of the enslavement of people whom his own countrymen had enslaved, and on behalf of a country where slavery still persists, more than a century after emancipation has occurred throughout the Western world.

"Roots" also feeds the gross misconception that slavery was about white people enslaving black people. The tragedy of slavery was of a far greater magnitude than that. People of every race and color were both slaves and enslavers, for thousands of years, all around the world. Europeans enslaved other Europeans for centuries before the first African was brought across the Atlantic. Asians enslaved other Asians, as well as whatever Europeans they could get hold of. Slavery existed in the Western Hemisphere before Columbus ever got here.

Slavery, like cancer, was not limited to any particular country or race. To talk about cancer as if it were an American disease, or a white or black disease, would be absurd. If reparations were to be paid for slavery, everybody on this planet would owe everybody else.

There is no danger of that actually happening. The danger is that too many blacks, especially among the young and the ill-educated, will be backing into the third millennium still looking back at centuries past -- or at fictions about centuries past -- when there are opportunities all around them that most people in the rest of the world today would die for.

The ancestors of black Americans were not taken from some Eden, and there is no Eden for black Americans to return to today. If compensation were to be paid for the difference between where they are and where their ancestors came from, they would owe money, not receive money. But it would be ridiculous to lose the future because of the past.

 


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Fighting Irish;Figit
***My wife and I ....... well let me correct that....my wife homeschooled our 4 children for 10 years....and I just breezed through the "classroom" from time to time. ***

Your wife may have been the one homeschooling your children...but I can assure you, your presence and support in all their lives leaves a huge mark. :o)

Homeschool Dad bump!

41 posted on 02/06/2002 6:17:07 AM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark
As a post script to Thomas Sowell's thoughtful piece, I'd offer this:

Robert Hitt Neill tells of attending a Tennessee Mountain Writer’s Conference years ago with several other authors. Among them was Alex Haley, celebrated author of “Roots.” Watching a TV news show, a group of them watched a demonstration in a Southern state against the “Rebel” flag incorporated into that state’s flag. The very next report covered a famine in Africa. Graphic images showed dead bodies, starving children with distended tummies and runny noses and dying people covered with flies, too weak to brush them away.

Mr. Haley intoned in a low, serious voice, “Every time an American black sees a story like that they should find a Confederate flag and kiss it.” He then pointed to the TV screen and continued, “Because these would be me and my descendants, except for American slavery. I thank God that my family and I are here instead of there.”

42 posted on 02/06/2002 7:04:59 AM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
People were not enslaved because they were black. They were enslaved because it was possible.

It is just a coincidence that out of 7 million slaves, 7 million of them were black.

No coincidence at all. Blacks came from Africa. African Blacks had no technology, an automonous tribal structure and an intertribal warfare ecomony lacking any possibilities of union against a common threat, and dealt in slaves in and among themselves.

Were you educated in the public schools after after 1970?

43 posted on 02/06/2002 8:02:02 AM PST by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson