Don't forget that the gay community can not reproduce therefore they must recruit, and they target the young, while they're still impressionable.
Rampant homosexuality has been at the core of almost every society that has collapsed from within.
It doesn't matter from a Christian or Darwinism point of view, either way it is a lose, lose situation. From a Christian point of view, we must remember that God love's the sinner, but hate's the sin
No, it isn't.
The cost of keeping an AIDs patient alive is financialy crippling to the state, Insur. co., and any living relative. AIDs is just one of the many disease that come's with promiscuous homosexl. behavior.
Then stop paying those costs. Government socialism is the problem here. Not homosexuals per se. I don't want to pay the medical bills for drug abusers, homosexuals, promiscuous heterosexuals, or anyone else for that matter. The issue here is government socialism, not homosexuality.
Don't forget that the gay community can not reproduce therefore they must recruit, and they target the young, while they're still impressionable.
Then prosecute and imprison anyone who has sex with children. But these people are called "pedophiles", not homosexuals. Sadly heterosexual pedophiles exist in even greater numbers.
Rampant homosexuality has been at the core of almost every society that has collapsed from within.
Hmmmm... you must have some information I am unaware of.
It doesn't matter from a Christian or Darwinism point of view, either way it is a lose, lose situation. From a Christian point of view, we must remember that God love's the sinner, but hate's the sin.
But you seem to be quite comfortable hating both.
I've always thought this particular charge against homosexuals is hilarious. It implies that IF homosexuals could "reproduce," then they would do so, and then have sex with the children. But it also implies that heterosexuals, who CAN "reproduce," do so in order to have children with whom they can then have sex.