[OWK]

I realize this is a long thread and you are attempting to defend several fronts, something that can be trying, therefore I will not take offense at your assertion that did not read your posts. The fact is I did read them. And it was something that both you and cubicle guy said. Specifally I reject your admonition of those who do not show disdain for "open displays of heterosexuality" - see your previous post:"I guess I'm a bit confused as to why you don't share an equal disdain for heterosexual promiscuity in public places, or heterosexual pedophiles, or open displays of heterosexuality. Aren't these things equally worthy of condemnation?" Let me be even clearer. We do not show disdain because open homosexual displays (ie. prolonged kiss at the airport or on prime time TV show) are not equivalent to identical heterosexual displays. Why? Well read my post!!!!!

I guess I was hoping that the reader would be able to recognize that I was talking about copulatory or specifically sexual acts (as opposed to a kiss at the airport) when I suggested that the poster should also show an equal disdain for public heterosexual acts.

[US admirer]

Fine. Well is you were not talking about non-copulatory acts then, let us talk about them now.

Do you accept and agree that prolonged kissing in public under the loving circumstances that I described is in fact different. As such does it or does it not justify censorship of such displays (by homosexuals) in public?

I do not wish to think of you as evasive hence I hope you will declare where you stand on this issue.