Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ethical
I never argued that homosexuality was a crime. Engaging in male/male anal sex in public places is a community health threat. The disease bred in homosexual behavior is a health threat to us all with ramifications that have and will continue to affect people who have never engaged in homosexual acts. It is a problem we can not ignore no matter how much we want to say that it is a matter concerning the bedroom only.

I guess I'm a bit confused as to why you don't share an equal disdain for heterosexual promiscuity in public places, or heterosexual pedophiles, or open displays of heterosexuality.

Aren't these things equally worthy of condemnation?

Isn't it pedophilia, public sexuality, and public promiscuity you oppose?

Regardless of whether the perpetrator is heterosexual or homosexual?

If not, why not?

172 posted on 01/29/2002 9:29:52 AM PST by OWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: OWK
I guess I'm a bit confused as to why you don't share an equal disdain for heterosexual promiscuity in public places,

Why would you think that? Was the thread about homosexuals or heterosexuals? I'm on topic.

309 posted on 01/29/2002 2:40:51 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson