Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unsycophant
If he'd call it 'art' with a vulgar name, nobody would care.

And if he included feces and urine stains, he would have the ACLU to defend him.

66 posted on 01/29/2002 5:45:42 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: 11th Earl of Mar
Not only the ACLU defending him, but some kind of gimme funding to pay for it's erection.
124 posted on 01/29/2002 10:12:53 AM PST by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
If he'd call it 'art' with a vulgar name, nobody would care.

And if he included feces and urine stains, he would have the ACLU to defend him.

Both of these statements are 100% true.If someone would've thought to do this,say, "Pre-1965" There wouldn't be a problem or ANY questions asked at all.

138 posted on 01/29/2002 11:49:32 AM PST by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson