[paul in cape]

GO PATS!

[knarf]

Ab so tively!!!

[SamAdams76]

Here's another reason:

The Rams are being given Monday and Tuesday off to make arrangements for the off-season.

[Timmy]

Yeah, but they have to beat the best, toughest team in football to do it. And the Rams are better offensively AND defensively than the Pats. Good year for the kids, though. And nothing to be ashamed of when the Rams fly by them by 21.

[JZoback]

The Pat's are in the Superbowl???

< Just Kidding >

[jackbill]

Who are the Patriots?

[kidkosmic1]

This will be a classic..the "Washington Generals" get blown out by the "Greatest Show on Turf". AFC straw men, ahhh, the good 'ol days...

[Revolting cat!]

And the reason Number One:

(1) Like professional wrestling, American football is fixed!

[RonPaulLives]

Hmmmm. You left out the following:

(11.) If in danger of losing, the referees will reverse an obviously correct call to give them the game.

[Vladiator]

They have spell checkers?

[Cicero]

Keep in mind that if the Patriots win, the Stock Market will crash. Would it be worth it?

[gortklattu]

Hey, number 5 is coming up.

Sorry!

[Iowegian]

Hmmmm, this threads bears a striking resemblence to the thread I read yesterday, Why the Eagle will beat the Rams. And one I read 2 weeks ago, How the underdog Packers will upset the Rams. Those weren't the exact titles, but you get the idea. We Ram fans don't need to brag and trash talk, we let the team do the talkin', by winning. Where did a;; those Packer and Eagle fans that predicted their wins go?

[Antoninus]

As a dejected Eagles fan, let me just say that I hope the Pats whoop up on those crummy Rams. And after the lickin' that my boys put on Field Marshal Faulk today, they should have an easier time of it.

Go Pats Go!

[OliverWendellDouglas]

cuz there from new england and its a leftist state and if they don't win there are going to be alot "suicides."

[Dave S]

You forgot a couple things. Rams #1 Offense in NFL, #3 Defense. Thats for the season and they are playing better now than they were when they beat New England before. The Rams have only lost when they have given up the ball via interceptions and fumbles. They have done little of that in the past few weeks. Their opponents have, however.

My guess is about the same score as today.

[Windshark]

Sorry...Pats are great, underrated.

But the Rams are better.

This could be a great game, much like two years ago.

Brady has a will to win like no other QB I have seen in a long time. Gifted and also underrated. Bledsoe is no slouch.

It could be very close...but as good as the Pats defense is (are?)...the Rams are so hard to stop. Rams have the edge in intangibles...

Rams 24....Pats 17

[SlickWillard]

Isn't the Superbowl on astroturf in the Superdome? Football on grass and football on astroturf are two completely different games. It's very nearly impossible to beat a team with St. Louis's speed if you have to play them on astroturf.

[STD]

Spelling advantage to St. Louis

[Lokibob]

I want to hear Rush eat crow in the A.M.. He gave the Pats no chance, calling everyone idiots that called in friday supporting them.

Point is well taken that they have 2 starting QB's.

[Aquinasfan]

The guy's right. To beat the Rams, the Pats will have to have a great game. But they can do it. I feel it in my bones. If you haven't been following the team all season, you wouldn't get it. The Pats have '69 Jets written all over them.

And if Antowain Smith hadn't fumbled on the Ram's three just before half-time, the Pats probably would have beaten the Rams earlier this year.

The ten point spread for yesterday's game was the best bet of the year.

The line should have been Steelers +3 instead of +10.