[Ol' Sparky]

There is NO fossil record of macroevolution, let alone in whales. Nor could land mammals have evolved step-by-step into whales or dolphins. Both land mammals and whales and dolphins have multiple functions that are required for land or for sea.

What you presented is the lamest theory to support the evolution fairy tale.

It's laughable anyone could even believe the speculation that was presented in this article. It's science fiction at its very worst.

[VadeRetro]

There is NO fossil record of macroevolution, let alone in whales. Nor could land mammals have evolved step-by-step into whales or dolphins. Both land mammals and whales and dolphins have multiple functions that are required for land or for sea.

This is your answer to what has been presented on whale evolution. You simply repeat what the evidence refutes.

Fine! I just wanted the lurkers to see what's going on here. Gladwin nailed you solidly in post 142.

[VadeRetro]

It's laughable anyone could even believe the speculation that was presented in this article. It's science fiction at its very worst.

You have a scoop. Your Nobel awaits you when you prove that all the world except you, Dembski, Behe, et. al. have it wrong. Except, even there, did you know your buddy Behe claims to believe in something he calls "descent with modification?"