Replies

There is NO fossil record of macroevolution, let alone in whales. Nor could land mammals have evolved step-by-step into whales or dolphins. Both land mammals and whales and dolphins have multiple functions that are required for land or for sea.

This is your answer to what has been presented on whale evolution. You simply repeat what the evidence refutes.

Fine! I just wanted the lurkers to see what's going on here. Gladwin nailed you solidly in post 142.

There is NO evidence. If there is a fossil the proves whales evolved PROVIDE a LINK to the PICTURE of it. You KNOW there is no fossil that proves that a whale evolved. All you have is these silly little drawings and absurd theories that defy common-sense on how a whale could have evolved.

Are you going to be the evolutionist with the guts to call Bob Enyart at 1-800-8Enyart between 9 and 10 p.m. ET.? Patrick Henry and Jenny P haven't got the guts. Do you? Funny, when Bob debated one of the top experts on evolution, Eugenie Scott, she never brought up the transitional fossil involving the alleged evolution of whales. In fact, she was forced to admit there was no fossils that showed macro evolution. But, if you have the fossil, get you fingers punching in the numbers so we can here you at www.kgov.com.

The problem for Darwinians is in trying to find an explanation for the immense number of adaptations and mutations needed to change a small and primitive earthbound mammal, living alongside and dominated by dinosaurs, into a huge animal with a body uniquely shaped so as to be able to swim deep in the oceans, a vast environment previously unknown to mammals . . . all this had to evolve in at most five to ten million years—about the same time as the relatively trivial evolution of the first upright walking apes into ourselves.3 F. Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe (Ticknor & Fields, New Haven & New York

Evolutionist Michael Denton described the problem of such a fantastic transition by saying: ". . . we must suppose the existence of innumerable collateral branches leading to many unknown types . . . one is inclined to think in terms of possibly hundreds, even thousands of transitional species on the most direct path between a hypothetical land ancestor and the common ancestor of modern whales . . . we are forced to admit with Darwin that in terms of gradual evolution, considering all the collateral branches that must have existed in the crossing of such gaps, the number of transitional species must have been inconceivably great.4 M. Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (Adler & Adler, 1985), p. 174.