[JulieRNR21]

The fact that the liberal media has surpressed the truth about what really happened at that W. VA Law College speaks volumes about its anti-Second Amendment bias.

[GOPJ]

The book "Bias" is just a start. All of us would buy a book on media bias against gun research, gun owners, and truthful crime stats. Do publishers really want to make money, or just push liberal books? Do they read the writing on the wall?

The fact that the liberal media has surpressed the truth about what really happened at that W. VA Law College speaks volumes about its anti-Second Amendment bias.

[editor-surveyor]

"...speaks volumes about its anti-Second Amendment bias."

They don't give a rat's seat cushion about the 2nd ammendment. - What they fear is anything that empowers the people. - UN tyranny cannot succeed without supressing dissent, and our guns are the only thing left in their way.

[Landru]

"The fact that the liberal media has surpressed the truth about what really happened at that W. VA Law College speaks volumes about its anti-Second Amendment bias."

Indeed.
And then there's the pathetic, lousy journalism routinely practiced by some mighty sorry wannabe, "journalists;" regardless the matter.
Seems fufilling &/or satisfying the aged-old jouranalistic tenets, "who-what-where-when & why" formerly required of any story?
Appears these rules have been forgotten?
Perhaps the rules were, "lost somewhere" along the line -- or maybe discarded; inadvetently.
They're not practiced in any way, shape, or form a'tall by this *new*, improved breed of scribe produced by today's university journalism priests; unless?
The omission was by design?
Let's say...on account of *some* Leftist skewed & ideologically inspired/agendized purpose?

...nawwwww, I'm sorry -- they wouldn't do that; *integrity* & all that. ;^)