Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quantum Gravitational States Observed For First Time
UniSci via PhysLINK ^ | 21-Jan-2002 | (Reference: Nesvizhevsky et al., Nature, 17 Jan 2002.)

Posted on 01/24/2002 8:47:50 AM PST by vannrox


Quantum Gravitational States Observed For First Time


Quantum properties usually show up only at the atomic level. Those properties include the quantization of energies, wavelike dynamics including interference, and an irreducible uncertainty in the simultaneous measurement of position and momentum.

Such properties also occur under special circumstances (e.g., low temperatures) in which a particle is trapped in a potential well by a controlling force.

Observing such properties in phenomena governed by the electromagnetic or the weak and strong nuclear forces is common.

But the strength of gravity, many orders of magnitude weaker than the other forces, has not been strong enough to enforce the kind of confinement needed to make quantum reality manifest.

Such an effect has now been seen for the first time: An experiment with ultracold neutrons shows that their vertical motion in Earth's gravitational field comes in discrete sizes.

Physicists at the Institute Laue-Langevin reactor in Grenoble, France, employ a beam of ultracold neutrons. Moving at a pace of 8 m/sec (compared to 300 m/sec for an oxygen molecule at room temperature), the neutrons are sent on a gently parabolic trajectory through a baffle and onto a horizontal plate.

Because the neutrons bounce at such a grazing angle, the plate is essentially a mirror for the neutrons, which are reflected back upwards until gravity saps their ascent; then the neutrons start falling again, eventually to be captured by a detector.

In effect, the neutrons are caught in a vertical potential well: gravity pulls down, while atoms in the surface of the mirror push up.

The researchers report seeing a minimum (quantum) energy of 1.4 picoelectron volts (1.4 x 10^-12 eV), which corresponds to a vertical velocity of 1.7 cm/sec. A comparison of this energy level to the minimum energy for an electron trapped inside a hydrogen atom, -13.6 eV, demonstrates why this kind of detection has not been made before.

The experiment also provides preliminary evidence for higher quantized motion states. In the horizontal direction, there is no confinement and therefore no quantum effect.

(Neutron-interferometry experiments, in which neutron waves are split apart, moved around separate paths and then brought back together to produce an interference pattern, have been influenced by gravity, but these neutron waves were not quantum states owing to the gravitational field. By contrast, the Laue-Langevin experiment is the first to observe quantum states of matter [neutrons] in Earth's gravitational field.)

The next step is to use a more intense beam and an enclosure mirrored on all sides (the energy resolution improves the longer the neutrons spend in the device).

An energy resolution as sharp as 10^-18 eV is expected, which would allow one to test such basic propositions as the equivalence principle, according to which the neutron's gravitational mass (as measured by its free fall in gravity) is the same as its inertial mass (as prescribed by Newton's second law, F=ma, where F is a generic force and a is the acceleration imparted).

(Reference: Nesvizhevsky et al., Nature, 17 Jan 2002.)

(Editor's Note: This article, with some editing, draws upon PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE, the American Institute of Physics Bulletin of Physics News Number 573, January 16, 2002, by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and James Riordon.)

21-Jan-2002



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
ERP...
1 posted on 01/24/2002 8:47:50 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Someone translate this for me. This means that gravity is only exerted in discrete chunks, right? A body can exert 1 unit of gravity, or 2 units, etc., but not 1.5 units?
2 posted on 01/24/2002 8:54:15 AM PST by silmaril
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silmaril
Someone translate this for me.

Noooooo!!! I like the way it sounds and enjoy letting it just roll over me a couple times before I try and figure it out.

3 posted on 01/24/2002 8:57:57 AM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: silmaril
This experiment really doesn't show that gravity is quantized. The title is inappropriate. It is one of many experiments that show that particles are acurately described by waves. The particle here is an uncharged particle in a potential well. It is a bound state, similar to a particle in a box, where the particle is restricted between a mirror and the gravitational field. When particles are confined, they can only have certain energies. The only thing that can be said about gravity from this experiment is that it works as expected to keep the particle from traveling off into space.

When particles are restricted this way there are discrete locations, within the box, where the particle is likely to be found, and other locations where the particle is not likely to ever be found. That's because the energy the particle gains, or loses must be an integral multiple of h, Planck's constant

4 posted on 01/24/2002 9:17:28 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"Such an effect has now been seen for the first time: An experiment with ultracold neutrons shows that their vertical motion in Earth's gravitational field comes in discrete sizes.

Sounds remarkably like Miliken's oil drop experiment to determine elementary charge, except with much smaller drops.
5 posted on 01/24/2002 9:23:39 AM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; RadioAstronomer
bump :)
6 posted on 01/24/2002 9:36:21 AM PST by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Thank you for the clarification. You're right -- the title is extremely misleading.
7 posted on 01/24/2002 9:40:17 AM PST by silmaril
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Bump to read later.
8 posted on 01/24/2002 9:48:20 AM PST by techcor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silmaril

"...The experiment also provides preliminary evidence for higher quantized motion states. In the horizontal direction, there is no confinement and therefore no quantum effect..."


9 posted on 01/24/2002 10:01:12 AM PST by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"Bridge, this is Captain Kirk. Beam me up, I have no clue what they are talking about."
10 posted on 01/24/2002 10:05:17 AM PST by skateman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
I think a further interpretation of this report is that it confirms that gravity works just like other forms of radiant energy in imparting discrete energy levels to particles. That is, that particles can have an energy level 'A' or level 'B', but not 'A.2357', for example. So as you said, gravity is simply another wave phenomenon.
11 posted on 01/24/2002 10:29:05 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spunkets
Lessee . . . 'i' before 'e', except after . . .
12 posted on 01/24/2002 10:51:01 AM PST by worryfree718
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
"I think a further interpretation of this report is that it confirms that gravity works just like other forms of radiant energy in imparting discrete energy levels to particles."

All that can be said about gravity in this experiment is that it is acting as a wall, a restraint that restricts the motion of the particle in a specific direction. It's the restricting of the particle that causes the appearance of the discrete energy levels. There are 2 walls here, one is the hard mirror and the other is a spring(gravity). Neither impart energy to the particle, they just reverse it's direction. The energy of the particle was arrived at before it entered the space between the walls. The difference in energy any particle had in excess to any of the allowed levels in the box was radiated as heat when it entered the box.

13 posted on 01/24/2002 10:59:41 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: worryfree718
"c", I saved that one from "acurately" so I could answer your ?.
14 posted on 01/24/2002 11:09:47 AM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
This is old stuff. We have known forever that the angle of the dangle is directly related to the heat of the meat. Py101
15 posted on 01/24/2002 12:38:15 PM PST by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson