And she inserts a lot of "ahs". That's her generations' equivalent of "like." Ever sit on a bus and listen to teens and 20's conversations? It's almost as bad as listening to Her Heinous.
It doesn't take a W to say "Uh" and "You know". (I am waiting for another of your QWERTY delights.) :o)
You know...we won. Musta worked.
You're breaking new and (you know) very exciting ground here, Mia. Now there will be text books written using your finely-honed analytical techniques.
Brilliant stuff here.
|
Background: Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule. Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield. A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. (Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the ugly questions.) Analysis: Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time. Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter. ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?" Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character). Results:
|
The Clintons are, and will remain, the personification of the trite evil spawned by American/leftist culture: self-absorbed, solipsistic, hateful of democracy in their faux and egotistical sense of moral superiority; peronistas; utterly lacking in humanity. This absurd leftist culture is naive and destructive. It is a powerful culture of ego, destructive to all of us who are not as "smart" as they are.
Mia T brings all this out.
Conservatives on this board indulge themselves, and are not content with being correct ... they must be correct in a stated superior way.
The worst abusers seem to be Christians, who are so often correct, but correct in a way which is stated to call attention to themselves.
Christian culture needs to get real. Christian culture is highly self-absorbed, in all its manifestations, "liberal" and "conservative." There is a deeper message Mia T is giving ... not that she intends it.
Mia is pointing to a phenomenon applicable to us all. It is evil in itself. It is the Clintons, who are a peculiar form of American, truly American, evil.
At the most basic level, it is an evil which says, "Look at me." The spotlight and the celebrity are the primary concern. Conservatives must know that "look at me" is the enemy of themselves and what they know to be true.
Mia, I know, highlights, I know, the mental vacuity of leftists, I know, of whom the Clintons are the prime example. Do you know?
My contention is that the Clintons are Shakespearian in their evil ... subtle, absorbed, bad actors who are slick actors.
Mia T should be encouraged rather than dicouraged, I think.