[ArGee]

I'm kinda with you on this one, but I heard Kate Michelman in a debate with Rev. John Rankin and it's pretty clear that one of the reasons she is such a staunch defender of a woman's rights is the way she was violated by her husband.

She doesn't say it that way. I'm not sure if she sees it that way. But it sure comes across that way.

I wonder how abortion attitudes would change if the father had to be aborted with the baby so he couldn't create any more unwanted pregnancies. Dr. Will, any thoughts?

Shalom.

[ProudGOP]

I wonder how abortion attitudes would change if the father had to be aborted with the baby so he couldn't create any more unwanted pregnancies.

Judging from the reactions of many man-hating feminists, I would say the number of abortions would increase.

[Dr. Good Will Hunting]

I wonder how abortion attitudes would change if the father had to be aborted with the baby so he couldn't create any more unwanted pregnancies.

Ideologically, abortion is patricide. It is an expression of heterophobia, and the need of a woman to kill a man's heart and soul by murdering his child. This is why feminists are anti-life and anti-men. The two are one.

[Elsie]

.......is the way she was violated by her husband.

So.... let's see if I've got this right.

---

Her husband is a bad man, therefore she kills her unborn child. Yeah, THAT makes a lot of sense!

---

A REAL woman would have killed her HUSBAND - NOT her child!!!!