Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L_Candide;harrison bergeron;wwjdn;illbay;argee;khepera;MVV;rdb3;spectre;FITZ;xzins;Phaedrus...
I don't quite have time to explain the meaning of life to you. Here is the brief version:

1. The core of manhood is fatherhood. No man can forego his right to protect his own children, from conception forward, without losing his raison d'etre, his very soul.

2. The antipathy towards fatherhood illustrated by yourself and others correlates directly with an antipathy towards the very lives of innocent prenatal babies. These twin antipathies are flip sides of the same coin.

3. So it is that Feminists For Life is the only feminist site on the net which has anything positive to say about fathers, or men in general for that matter. The mainstream, pro-abort feminist sites are virulently anti-male. That's very, very easily evidenced by simply going to any of them (like now.org) and running terms like dad or father on their internal search engines. You get a ton of articles; all unbelievably negative.

Thus, the correlation between being anti-fatherhood and being anti-prenatal-baby is quite clear.

I am one of the few people in the world who refuses to stereotype women or stereotype men.

Simply put, I recognize that the percentages of each that are good will be about equal...and the percentages of each who are bad are about equal.

Why?

Because good and bad are not rooted in gender, they are rooted in thought and action.

And despite the efforts of a few who would rather twist and obfuscate reality rather than acknowledge it, my highest allegiance in life is to life itself.

And to a rational dissemination of the facts, uncolored by misplaced excuses, or the rather sexist notion that one gender is less capable of murder than the other. Both genders are equally capable of it, and their victims suffer just as much.

If a woman willfully aborts an innocent prenatal baby, she is 100% morally liable for so doing. Just as much as Christian Longo, the guy who killed his kids. No less.

I advocate equality.

No excuses for the women who kill kids.

No excuses for the men who kill kids.

And not one single drop of sympathy for women who kill, or for men who kill.

My sympathy is with their victims only.

41 posted on 01/21/2002 7:17:45 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
Regarding "…your psychotic rants this past month…"

Gee Doctor, I have not read all of your posts but you string words together so well I never would've guessed you're a psychotic. Maybe we need a few more psychotics. Some of us sane people don't write so meaningfully. On the other hand, maybe I'm psychotic too because I pretty much agree with the post I am replying too. And I figure anything I might disagree with would probably turn out to be a matter of semantics that we could get past.

42 posted on 01/21/2002 8:22:34 PM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
Im not anti fatherhood at all. The only thing I have ever said is I don't support a ban on abortions before the unborn child starts having neurological activity for without that their is no consciousness. I support a ban on all abortions after that.
45 posted on 01/21/2002 11:11:03 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
My take on abortion is that it is murder. Now, whether or not God forgives the circumstances is up to him. But if I knew anyone who was going to get an abortion, I would desperately try my level best to stop her.

Responsibility? Let's try this. In the Catholic Church if just ONE partner, male or female, practices birth-control, and the other is aware of it, then they are BOTH guilty of birth control (at least it used to be that way). So, they both are living in sin.

IF the couple agree to an abortion, then they are BOTH guilty.

I don't like the idea of the biological father not being informed of a pending abortion, or not being considered. Yes, I agree the father should have a right to be involved in whatever action concerning abortion is contemplated. It's his unborn child too.

sw

60 posted on 01/22/2002 3:22:39 PM PST by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting;anniegetyourgun;wwjdn;L_Candide
"I advocate equality. No excuses for the women who kill kids. No excuses for the men who kill kids. And not one single drop of sympathy for women who kill, or for men who kill. My sympathy is with their victims only." How about sympathy for the women who kill kids, then repent? No? Well only SOLIDARITY then. Yes? Thanks, but I got my forgiveness when Jesus died on the cross, so SOLIDARITY it is!!

Hi, wwjdn. And hello again to you, too L_Candide.

I am pretty new around here, so I don't know if it is bad form to suggest visiting another thread. If it is not, please take a look at the one wwjdn started earlier this week. It is called "Abortion's biggest LIE!!" I know it is bad form not to include the link, but, like I said, newbie who hasn't taken the time to learn how. Maybe wwjdn would be so kind as to do that for you in another post. I think it is relevant to the topic at hand, and has the bonus of involving some of the same people.

But even if you don't go it must be said. Women, and women alone, choose to kill their children. Abortion is one of Satan's greatest tools. He has reaped millions and millions of souls because of it. IT MUST END.

May the Lord's Grace and Peace be with you.

---the Queen---

68 posted on 01/24/2002 8:43:42 PM PST by queenofsardonia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson