Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese Eyes Territorial Claim Of Outer Space
spacedaily.com ^ | 21 Jan 02 | Wei Long

Posted on 01/20/2002 7:59:42 PM PST by RightWhale

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-02f.html

DRAGON SPACE

Chinese Eyes Territorial Claim Of Outer Space

by Wei Long

Beijing - Jan 21, 2002

A group of Chinese space scientists urged the government to accelerate acceptance of the proposal to develop an infrastructure in space and regard developing the "space territory" as a national strategy, the Hong Kong Bureau of the China News Agency reported last Tuesday (Jan. 15). The group also suggested to claim access to space as China's "fourth territory".

In the recently submitted consultation report "Building of China's Space-based Infrastructure", space technology specialist Wang Xiji of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and three other Academy colleagues contended that conventional ground-based space facilities would no longer meet future requirements, so they proposed the construction of a space-based infrastructure. The report said that "opening up of outer space would require infrastructure in space; much like development of land, sea and air which require ground facilities such as railroads, sea ports, power stations and airports."

Wang elaborated on the concept: "The so-called space-based infrastructure refers to the engineering system that will be built in space, and used in developing and exploiting space resources and expanding the habitation space of humankind.

"The system will consist of space vehicles and their ground supporting facilities which would provide long-term stable functions and services. In fact, it is an integration of space- and ground-based national development of strategic infrastructure."

The group of CAS space specialists also argued that by virtue of having "vehicles that take up positions in space and the ability to possess part of the space resources", a country would effectively extend its three territorial claims -- land, sea and air -- into space; thus the claim of the "fourth territory".

The 1967 United Nations "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies" declares that the benefits and interests in the exploration and use of outer space belongs to the "province of all mankind".

Chinese space scientists recognize that there is a fierce competition of space resources, but most nations do not currently have the capability to be a participant. Therefore China should not miss out the opportunity to be part of the "space civilization".

According to the authors of the consultation report, China has "in effect a substantial capacity to enter, develop and exploit space. One of the reasons that China has not utilized its full capacity is restricted by a lag in the consciousness of the people and the nation.

"For a long time China has not given a serious regard to its capability to develop, exploit as well as reap huge political, military and economic benefits from the 'fourth territory'. Speaking from this sense, the concept and perspective of 'space territory' needs vigorous promotion in China. Developing 'space territory' should be treated as a fundamental national strategy along with birth control planning and environment protection."

The report recommends eight areas of space-based infrastructure:

* Discuss issues in building a high-speed information highway; * Increase steadily the level of performance in meteorology infrastructure; * Plan resource [Ziyuan series] satellites as part of the national earth-resource infrastructure; * Establish a 3-D navigation and positioning infrastructure based on the existing twin [Beidou series] navigation and positioning satellites foundation;

* Establish a national geographic information infrastructure based on the survey satellite foundation;

* Planned development of the ocean [Haiyang series] satellites into an ocean observation, monitoring and research infrastructure;

* Develop as quickly as possible a disaster and environment monitoring infrastructure;

* Develop a comprehensive civilian information network suitable for use during wartime.

To implement the proposed space-based infrastructure, the report suggests to take a three-stage approach:

1. Use effectively satellites that are on-orbit and under development, and place them in the top tier of planning as a starting foundation. This stage would mark a change in the direction of Chinese space technology development: from primarily technology of entering space to technology of utilizing space functions.

2. Build and effectively use an elementary comprehensive information network, which would provide effective support of the national development of the space-based infrastructure. This stage would mark the completion of an elementary space-based infrastructure. Chinese space technology development enters the phase of fulfilling urgent requirements and gradually adapting to national development.

3. Develop sequentially the space-based infrastructure according to the blueprint. This stage would mark the initial achievement of the strategic development of China's "fourth territory". The space-based infrastructure would have formed a definite scale and continue to develop to perfection.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
China has a plan. Their plan does not include NASA or America.
1 posted on 01/20/2002 7:59:42 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
We should claim the moon and mars for America now and start developing space weapons systems.
2 posted on 01/20/2002 8:04:01 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I got dibs on Uranus!
3 posted on 01/20/2002 8:05:44 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwww. Not enough sunlight for it to ever be habitable even with terraforming the moon is critical asa future base to mine the asteroid belt.
4 posted on 01/20/2002 8:07:21 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
China has a plan. Their plan does not include NASA or America.

I think their plan is called "taking the high ground"....

This could lead to a very interesting war.... if WE don't capitulate before it starts.

5 posted on 01/20/2002 8:08:25 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
The 1967 United Nations "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space

This treaty is meaningless, just some nice-sounding words. America should serve notice and withdraw from the treaty.

6 posted on 01/20/2002 8:08:42 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: weikel

7 posted on 01/20/2002 8:09:25 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Of course it does. Without Nasa or America they couldn't even send a rocket over the ocean. There can be no doubt that any space plan of the Chinese would heavily depend on American technology in order to have any chance of success.
8 posted on 01/20/2002 8:11:20 PM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longshadow
The US Air Force talks about the high ground, America must take it and hold it. Sounds like a direct challenge from China, but it's just words so far. When they finally get their taikonauts in orbit, that challenge will be hard to ignore, even in Congress. A space war is more than possible.
9 posted on 01/20/2002 8:13:02 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I got dibs on...

Whose???

10 posted on 01/20/2002 8:13:25 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Bla Bla Bla......they cant even take over Tiwan and its 90 miles away. Im not too worried.
11 posted on 01/20/2002 8:14:00 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Awesome picture, RBA....who did it???
12 posted on 01/20/2002 8:14:12 PM PST by Tennessee_Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Don't know. I found it actually.
13 posted on 01/20/2002 8:15:47 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
LOL!!
14 posted on 01/20/2002 8:16:09 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
Venus Williams?
15 posted on 01/20/2002 8:16:32 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
What's odd is that the image properties say it resides on the FR server:
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/caption/297/image
16 posted on 01/20/2002 8:18:01 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel
any space plan of the Chinese would heavily depend on American technology

What technology? America doesn't have a moon rocket anymore. America doesn't even have a plan. That's what we have been harping on for the past couple of years. NASA is dead in the water, or marooned in space, more appropriately. America is going nowhere in space.

17 posted on 01/20/2002 8:21:04 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Gosh. You got me. I am the owner of the server. Pics are hosted for $5 /month. Freepmail me for payment info ;)
18 posted on 01/20/2002 8:23:28 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The Chinese space agency has a tenth of the funding of Nasa and is about 40 years behind, but at least they have a grand goal in mind. Whereas Nasa with all its resources can't do anything better than a bunch of garbage cans floating in orbit. I say a good old fashioned space race between 2 determined nations can be far more productive than an international consortium effort.
19 posted on 01/20/2002 8:25:01 PM PST by borghead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
oh well. What do I know? Made sense when I wrote it.
20 posted on 01/20/2002 8:26:42 PM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson