Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1.8 Million Clinton-Gore emails found
GOP Portal ^

Posted on 01/20/2002 6:25:38 PM PST by Gemflint

1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAILS FINALLY FOUND!

(Washington, DC) - Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that the government, in a court filing January 9, 2002, has admitted that it found 1,844,242 e-mail from the Clinton-Gore White House. This e-mail has never been searched in response to subpoenas and documents requests from Judicial Watch, Congress, and independent counsels. The e-mail were restored at a cost to taxpayers thus far of $12,066,346. The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders.

Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months-long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon.

“We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate. Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: Doctor Raoul
Yep, I missed this earlier.
41 posted on 01/20/2002 7:46:49 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Goldi-Lox
------------------------------ (Time to stop ragging on Judicial Watch.)

I suggest you wait until something actually comes of all this before you make that pronouncement.

42 posted on 01/20/2002 7:47:15 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
Even if there's no actual illegality in there, this could still 'ruin' his legacy. In many ways, it was the paranoia, crude language and racism in Nixon's tapes that did him in almost as much as the lawbreaking.

I've long thought that the only thing that could doom clinton with his rabid supporters is a candid tape of him uttering the "N" word with malice in his heart.

Then again, the FJB incident didn't seem to hurt hillary much, so who knows. The Kevlar Couple might just be impermeable.

43 posted on 01/20/2002 7:52:38 PM PST by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint;beachooser;chaser;missprint
YAWN
44 posted on 01/20/2002 8:06:31 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
...high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing

Doesn't that qualify as extortion or something?

On a side note, AG must be sorry he invented the internet now! ;-)

cg
45 posted on 01/20/2002 8:17:06 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint;beachooser;chaser;missprint; VA Advogado
Advogado stole this line from Luis 'moveroner' - - poor avacodo - so clueless!
46 posted on 01/20/2002 8:19:11 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint;beachooser;chaser;missprint; VA Advogado
Advogado stole this line from Luis 'moveroner' - - poor avacodo - so clueless!
47 posted on 01/20/2002 8:19:54 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
"Advigekko ....do you and Luis have some kind of deal in addition to the same sleeping arrangements....ROFL.
48 posted on 01/20/2002 8:23:16 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado
addvodka, YAWN is such a simpleton word; steal more sophisticated lines from folks is my best advice to you...
49 posted on 01/20/2002 8:25:56 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: deport
Well, well....the truth is about to come out.
I'd like to think so... but if I had $6.50 for every time I said that about this bunch, I'd have 12,066,346 buck myself!
50 posted on 01/20/2002 8:26:21 PM PST by TheUglyAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Luis, lookee, another good Klayman find! What cha think?
51 posted on 01/20/2002 8:26:58 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint; goldilucky
bttt
52 posted on 01/20/2002 8:29:03 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
bttt
53 posted on 01/20/2002 8:29:17 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KLT
bttt
54 posted on 01/20/2002 8:29:30 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
bttt
55 posted on 01/20/2002 8:30:04 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
bttt
56 posted on 01/20/2002 8:30:15 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
AG must be sorry he invented the internet now! ;-)

LOL

57 posted on 01/20/2002 8:32:25 PM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
This is a con act to help restore the Clinton reputation. Once again the suckers will help Clinton do it. How many times does Judicial watch and the Clintons have to pull this act before we figure it out

So it's your contention that Larry Klayman gets up everyday and works hard to dig up stuff on Clinton, so that he can then show that Clinton didn't do anything wrong and the issue goes away? Wouldn't it be easier to not dig it up in the first place? Geesh!!!

58 posted on 01/20/2002 8:32:40 PM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
SUPERB!!! I knew Judicial Watch would eventually come around to this. Go get em, Larry!
59 posted on 01/20/2002 8:34:30 PM PST by goldilucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint
Whaaa? Has hell frozen over?

(Perhaps I judged Larry Klayman too quickly.. Do this Larry and you will have your very own "legacy" as the man who brought X42 down when no one else could.)

60 posted on 01/20/2002 8:35:49 PM PST by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson