Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1.8 Million Clinton-Gore emails found
GOP Portal ^

Posted on 01/20/2002 6:25:38 PM PST by Gemflint

1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAILS FINALLY FOUND!

(Washington, DC) - Judicial Watch, the public interest law firm that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, said today that the government, in a court filing January 9, 2002, has admitted that it found 1,844,242 e-mail from the Clinton-Gore White House. This e-mail has never been searched in response to subpoenas and documents requests from Judicial Watch, Congress, and independent counsels. The e-mail were restored at a cost to taxpayers thus far of $12,066,346. The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders.

Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months-long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon.

“We are confident that the e-mail contains a treasure trove of information concerning Filegate, Chinagate, and, yes, even Enrongate. Any incriminating e-mail will be part of renewed Judicial Watch efforts to put the Clintons in jail,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-167 next last
To: palo verde
For what it is worth, Larry Klayman may just be the man to somehow insure justice...I shook his hand at the FReeper Ball last year after his impassioned speech regarding bringing justice concerning the misdeeds of the Clinton/Gore group. His reaction when I thanked him for what he is doing...was genuine. I believe he is the real deal type of person.
121 posted on 01/21/2002 9:15:25 AM PST by YepYep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint
The declaration by a technician from Vistronix Corp. says that due to unspecified problems the computer contractor could not extract e-mails from 189 computer backup tapes.

I wonder what happened to this technicians career?

Probably fired.

122 posted on 01/21/2002 9:24:51 AM PST by taxbreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint
It does not make one bit of difference what the Clintons did, they could have burned down the Empire State Building and killed 247 old ladies in wheel chairs on the steps of teh Capital and NOTHING would be done, nothing at all.
123 posted on 01/21/2002 9:37:47 AM PST by gulfcoast6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER; BeAChooser; backhoe
bttt
I'll get down this thread to respond to Luis - sometime today, kids home - their hogging computer...(poor Luis, I have profound/exemplary knowlegde about this amended Loral Shareholders case - Luis are you prepared - poor guy...rofl)
124 posted on 01/21/2002 9:39:37 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: VA Advogado; MurryMom
Are you going to go on Luis' show to defend your pal Larry?

Oh good ... the PROVEN LIAR has shown up. Now only a few of the "move-on'ers" are missing. And isn't it telling that MurryMom agrees with them?

125 posted on 01/21/2002 10:12:36 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; VA Advogado; William Wallace
Hey Chooser, I guess this is one more example of the administration not investigating anything related to the Clintons.

And just what has the current administration done with these emails ... filed them away so they can be IGNORED along with all the other CRIMES? Why did we have to hear about this FIRST from Klayman, Luis? Doesn't the RNC even care to tell us anymore? Does the Bush administration care? And what was the motivation for recovering the emails in the first place ... a lawsuit by Klayman?

Yo! VA! I don't think Chaser has it in him to go on the air with me, I better go to plan "A" for this weeks' show, he was plan "B".

It is so instructive to see how "chummy" Luis is with "VA" ... the PROVEN LIAR. Of course, Luis isn't above spreading a little DISINFORMATION himself. Why else would he repost a post by William Wallace to me that contained material that I had previously demonstrated was DISINFORMATION or, perhaps, deliberate LIES about the Ron Brown case? Why do these three debate like democrats (running from facts, posting disinformation and lies, making adhominen attacks, smearing conservative news sources but NEVER identifying what sources they believe, putting their FAITH in reports put out by the Clinton administration)? Why are they doing everything in their power on this forum to defend democRATS from calls to investigate and prosecute democRAT crimes? Why won't any of these three address the FACTS in the Brown case ... the statements of the pathologists ... the x-ray? Why won't any of these three respond to a SIMPLE question about the Riady non-refund? One of two parties is lying so one of those parties violated the law. Why has the Bush ignored this ... when the case is about ELECTION TAMPERING! Three guesses folks ... these three are not the conservatives they claim.

126 posted on 01/21/2002 10:31:09 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
It does not make one bit of difference what the Clintons did, they could have burned down the Empire State Building and killed 247 old ladies in wheel chairs on the steps of teh Capital and NOTHING would be done, nothing at all.

Wouldn't it be sad if this ends up being the Bush "legacy" as far as history is concerned?

127 posted on 01/21/2002 10:34:26 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint
Oh, wouldn't it be nice if something very, very incriminating was found and we could get rid of Algore and the Klintons? Ahhhhhhhhhhh......shoot, it was only a dream! Well, maybe someday..............
128 posted on 01/21/2002 10:45:02 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
Maybe he's waiting until his second term. THEN maybe the grits will hit the fan? One can hope, you know. It springs eternal. In the meantime, I will NOT bet the farm...
129 posted on 01/21/2002 10:47:48 AM PST by Marysecretary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner
$6.50 per email

You have to remove tons of material for a single diamond.
I bet they find some real gems in this pile of rocks.

130 posted on 01/21/2002 10:48:31 AM PST by Barnacle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1 FELLOW FREEPER
coming from a good family...

Thank you- they are good kids; turning into fine young ladies, despite the rot of the nineties.

131 posted on 01/21/2002 10:49:47 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Klayman find?

I don't think there can be an arguement about it. Those e-mails (from the backup tapes) have been under subpeona due to the Judicial Watch filegate lawsuit.

A few whistle blowers working within the Clinton White House testifyed that they had reason to believe the the administration was going to destroy the tapes by "magnetic means" or "degaussing". The Clinton administration (looking to reward the whistle blowers no doubt. Ha!) went to Judge Lambert and demanded to know who the whistle blowers were. Judge Lambert told them to stuff it.

Judge Lamberth then told the Clinton officials that if those tapes are damaged he would "hang" them.

Later on, Judge Lamberth ordered the White House to prepare for a visit in "two hours" so he could personally inspect the tapes and the logs of those who had access to them. This is why we have the e-mails now and no credit should be given to the "government"

132 posted on 01/21/2002 12:26:07 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint;chaser
Well, this is a surprise....when's all the goodies start....I'm waiting to hear what's in those hidden e-mails....


133 posted on 01/21/2002 12:28:47 PM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
Four, too many people in the last 35 years have devised a delusional system whereby they look upon reality and pleas to take basic responsibility as an oppressive right-wing conspiracy. They have been supported in this belief by the media instead of having it challenged.

The Clintons have surfed this psychotic cultural and generational wave into the White House.

The attempt has been made to understand Bill and Hillary Clinton, particularly Bill, in terms of classical neurosis from abusive childhoods. But much of what is seen in the Clinton generation has made that model obsolete, although many from that generation, including psychiatrists and psychologists, desperately hold on to it to relieve themselves of any personal responsibility.

The truth is, Bill and Hillary Clinton have not suffered a bit of inconvenience for nearly 40 years¾including, for Bill, the inconvenience of military service. By his freshman year in high school Bill found he could manipulate people with showy glibness and deception, and nobody would call him on it. A good memory for acting lines would carry him through easy courses in the most prestigious schools in the country without effort or necessity to learn seriously. From there, he went almost immediately to being the boy governor of a state, and on to the presidency. It was all done with a little empty talk on a level that could be found on any high school debate team.

Hillary has led a similar life of ease and is now being pushed to take a senate seat and run for the presidency in 2004 on a platform of angrily confronting a vast right-wing conspiracy¾ which essentially consists of making accusatory and sarcastic remarks at you and me through a TV screen to the delight of angry women, spoiled angry leftists, and angry minorities. It isn't a bad life for an untalented spoiled brat who, without the world of TV and alienated politics, would be lucky to hold a job as a waitress in a truck stop.

The problem with the both Clintons is that they were long ago licensed to think and act at primitive, immature, and irrational levels of functioning. Much of this was a self-conferred licensing by a generation which has continued, and which has been the root of most of the political, economic, and social problems in this country.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert L. Kocher is the author of "The American Mind in Denial." He is an engineer working in the area of solid-state physics, and has done graduate study in clinical psychology. His email address is steiner@access.mountain.net.

from... The Laissez Faire City Times(link), Vol 3, No 7, Feb. 15, 1999

134 posted on 01/21/2002 12:33:51 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: mindwealth
STOP!

IT was slow and costly because of *who* the government hired for the job.

Clinton cronies...3 people, 2 of whom were prior appointees and "friends" of his.
135 posted on 01/21/2002 12:44:52 PM PST by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Gemflint
Please throw him away and lock up the key!
136 posted on 01/21/2002 12:46:48 PM PST by DTwistedSisterS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the catfish
""More like $6.54 per email""

SOUNDS UH....AHEM......FAIR?
137 posted on 01/21/2002 12:49:03 PM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: the rifleman
Cost for restoring e-mails: $12,066,346

Chance to nail the felon and chief once and for all: priceless.

138 posted on 01/21/2002 12:49:11 PM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
All kinds of juicy things might be in there. Mark Rich stuff? Monica? Something we haven't even heard of yet?

A little fatherly advice to Gary Con-did-it?

Shalom.

139 posted on 01/21/2002 12:51:50 PM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
A little fatherly advice to Gary Con-did-it?

It's like Christmas . . . I've got a wish-list as long as my arm!

So much could be in there. It's nice to hope.

140 posted on 01/21/2002 1:14:30 PM PST by Dominic Harr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-167 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson