Posted on 01/20/2002 6:25:38 PM PST by Gemflint
I wonder what happened to this technicians career?
Probably fired.
Oh good ... the PROVEN LIAR has shown up. Now only a few of the "move-on'ers" are missing. And isn't it telling that MurryMom agrees with them?
And just what has the current administration done with these emails ... filed them away so they can be IGNORED along with all the other CRIMES? Why did we have to hear about this FIRST from Klayman, Luis? Doesn't the RNC even care to tell us anymore? Does the Bush administration care? And what was the motivation for recovering the emails in the first place ... a lawsuit by Klayman?
Yo! VA! I don't think Chaser has it in him to go on the air with me, I better go to plan "A" for this weeks' show, he was plan "B".
It is so instructive to see how "chummy" Luis is with "VA" ... the PROVEN LIAR. Of course, Luis isn't above spreading a little DISINFORMATION himself. Why else would he repost a post by William Wallace to me that contained material that I had previously demonstrated was DISINFORMATION or, perhaps, deliberate LIES about the Ron Brown case? Why do these three debate like democrats (running from facts, posting disinformation and lies, making adhominen attacks, smearing conservative news sources but NEVER identifying what sources they believe, putting their FAITH in reports put out by the Clinton administration)? Why are they doing everything in their power on this forum to defend democRATS from calls to investigate and prosecute democRAT crimes? Why won't any of these three address the FACTS in the Brown case ... the statements of the pathologists ... the x-ray? Why won't any of these three respond to a SIMPLE question about the Riady non-refund? One of two parties is lying so one of those parties violated the law. Why has the Bush ignored this ... when the case is about ELECTION TAMPERING! Three guesses folks ... these three are not the conservatives they claim.
Wouldn't it be sad if this ends up being the Bush "legacy" as far as history is concerned?
You have to remove tons of material for a single diamond.
I bet they find some real gems in this pile of rocks.
Thank you- they are good kids; turning into fine young ladies, despite the rot of the nineties.
I don't think there can be an arguement about it. Those e-mails (from the backup tapes) have been under subpeona due to the Judicial Watch filegate lawsuit.
A few whistle blowers working within the Clinton White House testifyed that they had reason to believe the the administration was going to destroy the tapes by "magnetic means" or "degaussing". The Clinton administration (looking to reward the whistle blowers no doubt. Ha!) went to Judge Lambert and demanded to know who the whistle blowers were. Judge Lambert told them to stuff it.
Judge Lamberth then told the Clinton officials that if those tapes are damaged he would "hang" them.
Later on, Judge Lamberth ordered the White House to prepare for a visit in "two hours" so he could personally inspect the tapes and the logs of those who had access to them. This is why we have the e-mails now and no credit should be given to the "government"
The Clintons have surfed this psychotic cultural and generational wave into the White House.
The attempt has been made to understand Bill and Hillary Clinton, particularly Bill, in terms of classical neurosis from abusive childhoods. But much of what is seen in the Clinton generation has made that model obsolete, although many from that generation, including psychiatrists and psychologists, desperately hold on to it to relieve themselves of any personal responsibility.
The truth is, Bill and Hillary Clinton have not suffered a bit of inconvenience for nearly 40 years¾including, for Bill, the inconvenience of military service. By his freshman year in high school Bill found he could manipulate people with showy glibness and deception, and nobody would call him on it. A good memory for acting lines would carry him through easy courses in the most prestigious schools in the country without effort or necessity to learn seriously. From there, he went almost immediately to being the boy governor of a state, and on to the presidency. It was all done with a little empty talk on a level that could be found on any high school debate team.
Hillary has led a similar life of ease and is now being pushed to take a senate seat and run for the presidency in 2004 on a platform of angrily confronting a vast right-wing conspiracy¾ which essentially consists of making accusatory and sarcastic remarks at you and me through a TV screen to the delight of angry women, spoiled angry leftists, and angry minorities. It isn't a bad life for an untalented spoiled brat who, without the world of TV and alienated politics, would be lucky to hold a job as a waitress in a truck stop.
The problem with the both Clintons is that they were long ago licensed to think and act at primitive, immature, and irrational levels of functioning. Much of this was a self-conferred licensing by a generation which has continued, and which has been the root of most of the political, economic, and social problems in this country.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Kocher is the author of "The American Mind in Denial." He is an engineer working in the area of solid-state physics, and has done graduate study in clinical psychology. His email address is steiner@access.mountain.net.
from... The Laissez Faire City Times(link), Vol 3, No 7, Feb. 15, 1999
Chance to nail the felon and chief once and for all: priceless.
A little fatherly advice to Gary Con-did-it?
Shalom.
It's like Christmas . . . I've got a wish-list as long as my arm!
So much could be in there. It's nice to hope.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.