Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
It's a huge problem, as according to Kepler's laws, the speed should be inversely proportional to the square root of the radius. It's not.

Yet another question revealing my ignorance: Kepler described the orbits of the planets around our sun. Do Kepler's laws hold for stars orbiting the galaxy? Wouldn't you need a solid rotating disk of a galaxy to perform that way? Well, maybe not.

61 posted on 01/15/2002 12:22:11 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Yet another question revealing my ignorance: Kepler described the orbits of the planets around our sun. Do Kepler's laws hold for stars orbiting the galaxy?

It holds for a central potential. If most of the mass is concentrated at the center of the galaxy--which is where the brightness is concentrated--then it will hold.

The speed of a star around the galaxy is 2 pi times the radius (assume circular orbits), divided by the period. The period, per Kepler, is proportional to the radius to the 3/2 power. So the speed should be proportional to the -1/2 power. Instead, the speed is roughly independent of radius.

Wouldn't you need a solid rotating disk of a galaxy to perform that way?

In a solid rotating disk, the speed is proportional to the distance from the axis.

63 posted on 01/15/2002 12:46:36 PM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson