Getting Clinton off of the front page was a shrewd move on the Bush administration's part in settling in the White House. The media absolutely love the Clintons, and even though they hemmed and hawed over pardongate, they'd rather talk about Clinton than focus any light on Bush. Just after Bush took office, you'll recall, the only two things the media reported about him was that he didn't have any "mandate" and the Florida fiasco.
Now, however, with the Democrat-media complex aiming their sites again at Bush over Enron, their overreaching could bring down Clinton once Bush unleashes his Justice Department and does a full investigation.
It was also a shrewd move for Ashcroft to recuse himself as to avoid any conflict of interest charges since he received Enron contributions as well.
When I was in basic training, the drills instructed us on the rifle range about a potentially deadly "pop and no kick." That's when a malformed round fires, but lodges in the barrel. If you fire another round behind this one, the rifle would literally explode in your face.
Enron is a "pop and no kick" for the RATS, but they are salivating so profusely about a chance to down the Bush presidency, they didn't pay attention. Their rifle is about to explode right in their faces.
So, grab some popcorn, a Coke, sit back and relax. The fireworks are about to begin. It's going to be a magnificent show!
Sure....we have a lot of cause to expect that, don't we? /sarcasm>
Ah, the ever-seductive bauble shimmering in the distance, just out of reach...surely this will bring down Clinton...
When will we learn? NOTHING will "bring down" Clinton save history.
I heartily agree with the rest of your post, however.
So, grab some popcorn, a Coke, sit back and relax. The fireworks are about to begin. It's going to be a magnificent show!
Great article, fyi:
Steyn: They can't Pin This on Bush
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/607112/posts