Posted on 01/12/2002 9:35:48 AM PST by vmatt
[Federal Register: May 15, 2001 (Volume 66, Number 94)] [Notices] [Page 26849] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr15my01-64]
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. ER01-1394-000, et al.]
Enron Energy Services, Inc., et al.; Notice of issuance of Order
May 9, 2001.
Enron Energy Services, Inc., et al. (Enron Energy) submitted for filing a rate schedule under which Enron Energy will engage in wholesale electric power and energy transactions at market-based rates. Enron Energy also requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular, Enron Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval under 18 CFR Part 34 of all future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability by Enron Energy.
On April 27, 2001, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director, Division of Corporate Applications, Office of Markets, Tariffs and Rates, granted requests for blanket approval under Part 34, subject to the following:
Within thirty days of the date of the order, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by Enron Energy should file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214).
Absent a request to be heard in opposition within this period, Enron Energy is authorized to issue securities and assume obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the corporate purposes of the applicant, and compatible with the public interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by continued approval of Enron Energy's issuances of securities or assumptions of liability.
Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to intervene or protests, as set forth above, is May 29, 2001. Copies of the full text of the Order are available from the Commission's Public Reference Branch, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Internet at http://www.ferc.fed.us/online/rims.htm (call 202-208-2222 for assistance). Comments, protests, and interventions may be filed electronically via the internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.200(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site at http://www.ferc.fed.us/efi/doorbell.htm.
David P. Boergers, Secretary. [FR Doc. 01-12146 Filed 5-14-01; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It would be regardless and you know it. It grieves me to see this crap brother and I'm just pleased that I could get it aired out here on Freerepublic first. Clinton didn't dumb down my expectations of MY president. Just like the liberal who just posted, I want the truth, then I'll make up my mind.
extension, or improvement of facilities, describe in reasonable detail
the construction program for which the funds were or are to be used.
(2) If the purpose for such issuance is for the refunding of
obligations, describe in detail the obligations to be refunded,
including the character, principal amounts, applicable discount or
premium, dates of issuance and maturity, and all other material facts
concerning such obligations.
I would like to know why they wanted to issue the new securties at that specific point in time, wouldn't you?
Nice try, like the IRS, what ever party they belong to, they work under Bush now.
It's just the begining. We will restore democracy in America and end the reign of corporate money over the voice of the people.
Bush want's to be Caesar (your own Bill Safire said that). We'll just see about that!
My post wasn't deleted. I over reacted. Please disregard my last post.
I really hate getting ugly with my countrymen.
Could you explain what you are talking about? You say you don't like witch hunts, but that is what this is. There has been not one allegation of a single crime, there isn't even the apperance of a crime. There is nothing illegal about the donations, there is nothing illegal about any meetings, and there is nothing illegal about this waiver which is written in law and given to dozens of companies every year. Name one crime, please. This is the biggest non-scandal scandal I have ever seen.
What on earth are you talking about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.