Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron's Lay called Greenspan in October
Reuters ^ | Jan 11, 2002 | Reuters

Posted on 01/11/2002 5:31:22 PM PST by PhiKapMom

Friday January 11, 11:10 am Eastern Time

Enron's Lay called Greenspan in October

WASHINGTON, Jan 11 (Reuters) - Enron Corp.'s (NYSE:ENE - news) Chairman Kenneth Lay telephoned Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan on Oct. 26, a Fed spokesman confirmed on Friday.

The spokesman would not say what was discussed during the conversation but he did say that Greenspan did not follow up the call with any action.

``He did nothing in response to the call. It would have been inappropriate,'' the spokesman said.

The White House has said Lay called U.S. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Don Evans in the autumn. The White House said the two officials opted to do nothing about their calls.

The Justice Department on Wednesday announced it had opened a criminal investigation into the energy trading company, whose December bankruptcy threw thousands out of work, devastated investors and wiped out the pension plans of many employees when its stock price plunged.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: harpo11
You have a point! The list must be much shorter for who he didn't call! Lay was definitely in a panic!
21 posted on 01/11/2002 6:07:48 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: imperator2
Excuse us.....but, just because someone CALLS someone on the telephone you think they are involved in the doings of the company? It's prudent to take telephone calls from large employers, you idiot. This is AMERICA not CUBA. Big business has a stake in our world. What the person on the other end of the line DID about the call is what would be at issue, and it appears the Bush Administration is CLEAN, meaning, for your little pea brain, that they DID NOT BAIL THEM OUT. DUH.
22 posted on 01/11/2002 6:08:41 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
And, furthermore, NOT taking a call from a major business leader would be STUPID.
23 posted on 01/11/2002 6:09:36 PM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: imperator2
"If a government oficial receives a telephone call from a crook, it means that the politician is also crooked."

Do you teach in the public schools?

24 posted on 01/11/2002 6:13:34 PM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: okie01
If I were Enron my pleas would have been to avoid a conspiracy to defraud charge. A bailout would have cost them money.
25 posted on 01/11/2002 6:14:00 PM PST by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
Because many fear the worst may come. Frankly, all the parties are dirty or at least conflicted on this one. Maybe not the "cause" of the fall of Enron, but "guilty by association." Even Lieberman might have an ulterior motive in his one, a big connecticut backer is one of the largest creditors screwed by Enron.

Here's a couple of stories on Racicot:

New GOP Chairman Marc Racicot Mixes Politics and Profits

December 10, 2002

"President Bush's recent decision to name an active, registered lobbyist to head the Republican National Committee is a stunning metaphor about how power, money and hubris in Washington can dull the ethical judgment of an Administration that vowed to "restore honor and dignity" to the White House. It also provides a rare glimpse at the seamy side of our major political parties.

Former Montana Governor Marc Racicot is a registered lobbyist for the Houston law firm of Bracewell & Patterson, personally representing the controversial energy firm Enron, the American Forest and Paper Association, Burlington Northern Santa Fe, the National Energy Coordinating Council, the Recording Industry Association of America, and Quintana Minerals...

The Los Angeles Times reported in August that Racicot had lobbied Vice President Dick Cheney on behalf of the National Electric Reliability Council and his energy task force director, Andrew Lundquist, on the Environmental Protection Agency's attempts to require old plants to update their clean air equipment. The Cheney task force later recommended that the Justice Department consider dropping lawsuits it had filed against certain companies for alleged environmental violations. The Bush administration continues to stonewall requests to release information about the energy task force...

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said, "There's been ample history on both the Democratic and Republican side of chairmen being involved in either lobbying or having outside sources of income."...

[Comment about Ron Brown, also connected to Enron]

...Now Racicot has unabashedly, publicly declared at the onset of his tenure as national party chairman that he will simultaneously, actively lobby for major corporate clients with business before the federal government. That is a first, even in ethically challenged Washington...

_________

Racicot often defended his continuing lobbying stance. Here's an article from January 10, 2002 where he changes his view. The article implies two-sided pressure. I think that's the cover, it more likely was the announcement of criminal investigations. Representing a company labelled connected to the word "criminal", and also running the party is a bit too much even for Washington.:

Racicot to Give Up Lobbying Work

Bush's Pick to Run RNC Yields to Criticism From Both Parties

Marc F. Racicot, President Bush's choice to chair the Republican Party, yesterday yielded to complaints from the political right and left by announcing he will no longer lobby on behalf of major corporations and interest groups.

If confirmed next week as chairman of the Republican National Committee, Racicot said, "I will not represent the interests of clients before the Congress or the administration." He said he will continue, however, to work for the Texas-based law firm Bracewell & Patterson, which has numerous Washington clients.

...His clients have included Enron Corp., which is now under congressional and Justice Department investigation; the Recording Industry Association of America, which is often engaged in disputes over violent or sexual lyrics and copyright issues; [!] and the National Electric Reliability Coordinating Council, an alliance of electric companies seeking to modify enforcement of the Clean Air Act....

26 posted on 01/11/2002 6:14:34 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Is this a rotatorical question???
27 posted on 01/11/2002 6:17:46 PM PST by imperator2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
How much money did Clinton take from Enron Hum?
28 posted on 01/11/2002 6:23:09 PM PST by Blacksheep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
Now you tell me how any clear thinking conservative can blow this off as ONLY a Democratic ploy to drag Bush through the mud.

As soon as you can tell me how any clear-thinking DemocRAT (oxymoron) can think that ENRON gave hundreds of thousands of dollars to Clinton by funnelling money from LIPPO Group, the RIADY's, the People's Liberation Army and more during the '96 campaign finance scandal.

29 posted on 01/11/2002 6:27:00 PM PST by usconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: imperator2
Both parties took contributions from ENRON, not bribes. If President Bush gave Enron money and bailed them out then that would be wrong but he did not! I don't see blaming either party but the witchhunt is on by the demorats and the Republicans better have their act together. I think the real criminals here are the exectives of ENRON. JMHO
30 posted on 01/11/2002 6:29:54 PM PST by sibb1213
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Enron, like Moby Dick in its death throes, finds itself bound to its tormentor, and takes him down to the depths, as Captain Ahab, entangled in the rope lead on the harpoon, seems to be motioning for his men to follow....
31 posted on 01/11/2002 6:32:47 PM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
"If I were Enron my pleas would have been to avoid a conspiracy to defraud charge."

But Lay called Treasury, Commerce and the Federal Reserve. He didn't call Justice. Not that we know of, anyway.

And Robert Rubin called Treasury, too. In behalf of Enron's banker...

32 posted on 01/11/2002 6:42:28 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: okie01
And Enron's backer (Citicorp) is LIEberman's primary backer! Is LIEberman going to recuse himself?
33 posted on 01/11/2002 6:52:25 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I wonder if anyone quoted Miranda to Mr. Lay before he started talking.
34 posted on 01/11/2002 7:02:28 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Osinski
"Kenneth Lay...last years salary $141.6 million. Employees left holding the bag for billions. This guy's dirty and he's Bush's chief financial backer. Now you tell me how any clear thinking conservative can blow this off as ONLY a Democratic ploy to drag Bush through the mud."

You have certainly struck a nerve here...the truth is most painful for the deluded.

Those so quick to jump to the party line should take a moment to consider just how difficult this will be for the hard-working, long-time Enron employees who are nearing retirement...401(k) GONE...high paying job to finish paying off mortgage and putting kids through college GONE.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM, ANYONE?

35 posted on 01/11/2002 7:05:48 PM PST by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
"Is LIEberman going to recuse himself?"

Surely, you jest.

36 posted on 01/11/2002 7:11:55 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 3catsanadog
I just checked my recorder. He called me too, but I missed the message. Gosh, I feel really bad. Maybe I could have done something.
37 posted on 01/11/2002 7:48:52 PM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: okie01
That's like saying the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing. I don't buy it.
38 posted on 01/12/2002 5:31:28 AM PST by steve50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: steve50
"That's like saying the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing. I don't buy it."

No matter who Enron or its creditors called, or how often, they didn't get any satisfaction, did they?

And that is the point of this here exercise. The Bush administration apparently acted ethically in every respect -- not offering a taxpayer-financed bail-out (unlike the prior administration with ICMH) nor affording any legal relief (unlike the prior administration with Loral Corp.).

Net/net: Enron is a giant financial scandal...if there is a political scandal, as well, it belongs to the prior administration.

39 posted on 01/12/2002 7:53:58 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: spanky_mcfarland
CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM, ANYONE?

Tell me, just how does the Enron fraud bear on "Campaign Finance Reform"?

How would "campaign finance reform" have kept the fraud from happening? And how would it impact the sentencing of Lay and his henchmen for criminal fraud?

40 posted on 01/12/2002 7:57:33 AM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson