Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH’S "MEXICO CITY" ABORTION POLICY DEPENDS ON WHAT THE MEANING OF "IS" IS
BushWatch ^ | unk. | The Conservative Caucus

Posted on 01/11/2002 3:45:23 PM PST by rdavis84

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: sinkspur
But I learned that the Birchers are part of the Freemasons. Now it all makes sense!
21 posted on 01/11/2002 5:23:46 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; sinkspur;rdavis84
You are NOT going to believe this ... they are *all* in on 'it' ...
Produced in 1977 by a group of former high-ranking JBS members, "The Belmont Brotherhood" refers to the National Council at Belmont, Massachusetts where JBS national headquarters were originally located. Various sources cited therein document that the early members of the John Birch Society were also members of the liberal Establishment they pretended to oppose, and represented in great measure the corporate interests of America, which are advanced by the oaths of loyalty to one another in a secret brotherhood -- organized Freemasonry. This 12-page report concluded with the perceptive observation that the John Birch Society represents the most diabolical form of the Illuminati conspiracy:
"You may object: 'Look at all the great things [Founder, Robert] Welch has done - he has exposed the Illuminati.' Baloney. The Illuminati was merely a branch of the Conspiracy. How can one attack the Illuminati without attacking the diabolical power behind it: organized Freemasonry? Welch has provided the most valuable service of all time to the Conspiracy. He founded an organization to neutralize millions of Americans from discovering what the true power behind the Illuminati really was. And we concede the Mason's chose an extremely clever man to do the job. Welch, with the help of the Belmont Brotherhood, plays his role very effectively." 6.
My head is a-spinnin after that trip ...
22 posted on 01/11/2002 6:29:04 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; sinkspur; _Jim
Thanks for the bumps, guys. We'll get back to it tomorrow or Sunday.

You've all got a busy time here for the next ???? weeks, so I really appreciate your valuable input to this so far.

23 posted on 01/11/2002 6:31:01 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
Another JBS-exposing, Howard Phillips connection bump?

Sure-thing there Davis!

24 posted on 01/11/2002 6:39:35 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
You must have missed this ---

"Thanks for the bumps, guys. We'll get back to it tomorrow or Sunday.

You've all got a busy time here for the next ???? weeks, so I really appreciate your valuable input to this so far."

Hey, BTW, I noticed that even Deb got the duty over Enron.

25 posted on 01/11/2002 6:49:31 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: Patriot76
"They are not part of the JBS."

Don't Question _jim's stuff!! He's liable to start covering up the murders at Waco of all those kids spontaneously! BTW, he also knows ALL about the OKC/Murrah Murders.

27 posted on 01/11/2002 7:16:54 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
This thread is so typical of you, davis.

You post a lame article that is full of holes, the holes are exposed, and you change the subject.

You can't defend what you posted, you won't acknowledge that it's baloney, and so you end up.....babbling.

28 posted on 01/11/2002 7:23:21 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Patriot76
They are not part of the JBS.

So you say ...

Wanna be *proved* wrong?

29 posted on 01/11/2002 7:27:05 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: rdavis84
Mexico City 1984 ... excerpt from "The Final Solution: Population Control (3 of 3)
31 posted on 01/11/2002 7:41:55 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Waitaminute...you're saying that the Birchers are connected to THE FREEMASONS?

_Jim's gonna catch some serious hell for revealing the fact the Birchers are part of the Mason Deception Strategy to make all criticisms of the Masonic Interlock look like they came from wackos with breath that smells like scotch and milk.

I suspect he'll be announcing a short hiatus to spend "more time with his family" any moment now.

32 posted on 01/11/2002 7:43:46 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Bump for later....
33 posted on 01/11/2002 8:10:08 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Patriot76
yes, prove me wrong.

I've got this policy against 'pounding helpless, intelligence-limited creatures into the dirt' - you, exhibiting as you do the complete inability to do even a cursory search on the world wide web the compound terms: "Young Americans for Freedom" and the "John Birch Society" obviously fall into the aforementioned category ...

I'm also taking this opportunity to announce that I need to take some time off to, ahh, you know, spend some ahhh ... quality time with the family ...

34 posted on 01/11/2002 8:24:36 PM PST by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: _Jim

The connections ...

Howard Phillips, who founded The Conservative Caucus (TCC) at the direction of 33º Mason, Jesse Helms on whose staff he worked. TCC has an interlocking directorate (Phillips served on advisory board) with the United States Council for World Freedom (USCWF) of the WACL. Phillips also proposed the name for the Young Americans for Freedom and served on its board of directors.
Conclusion: ... Bircher ...

That's pretty neat. I'm halfway working on software for dynamic ecomaps/timelines now. But I have a test for you:

What are the Averell Harriman connections with Presidents Bush and former President Clinton? Would any of them have been President without Harriman money? Make some connections for me.

And since we're talking about eugenic population control here, plot out the connections between the Bush family, the Pioneer Fund, Planned Parenthood, the Population Council, USAID, IPPF, the Human Genome Project, and the American Eugenics Society. (There are other tight connections, but you have to start somewhere...)

35 posted on 01/11/2002 8:36:44 PM PST by toenail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Patriot76;truthandlife ; Vladiator ; Blood of Tyrants ;Digger ;Boxsford ; Campion ; grania ...
You can see by the above replies the typical method used by the "defenders" of Bush ;  _Jim, Poohbah, sinkspur,  is not based on detailed discussion, rather on "the Author", the "poster", and diversions from the topic at hand. If you've not noticed, they post VERY few articles themselves.

These people consider you to be stupid.  Personally, I get mad about that.

The Conservative Caucus that they deride so vehemently --- 

The Bush Watch
Reports on Bush, Cheney & Advisors
"What You See Is What You Get"
A Public Service of The Conservative Caucus

450 Maple Avenue East * Vienna, Va. 22180 * 703-938-9626 

------- reports on both the Good AND the Bad actions of the current administration. Browse thru their site and decide for yourself ------ http://www.conservativeusa.org/bushwatch.htm

Much issue was made about the "Mexico City" agreement in the last thread dealing with increased funding of "family planning" activities. Here's an analysis of that, and the above folks don't want to discuss it, just the poster, the personalities involved with The Conservative Caucus,  and anything BUT the article.

37 posted on 01/12/2002 4:23:40 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: petergraves ; Jefferson Adams ; homeschool mama ; cdwright ; Askel5 ; fod ; MI_too
Please see my last reply.
38 posted on 01/12/2002 4:25:22 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf ; Unbeliever ; mancini ; Lizavetta ; Psalm 73 ; Salvation ; horsewhispersc ; tberry
Please see #37.
39 posted on 01/12/2002 4:26:34 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy ; IM2Phat4U
Please see #37.
40 posted on 01/12/2002 4:27:41 AM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson