Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Luis Gonzalez
...I've been a mean man to his pet boy, BeAChooser, and I guess ChaseR feels obligated to protect his sycophants)

What? You didn't ping me! You promised you were going to keep doing that just to "yank" my "strings". Chicken out?

For the record, I don't need anyone's help to prove that you are RUNNING from the facts in the Ron Brown case. Since you RAN from the last thread where we "chatted", I'll just repeat (with minor rephrasing) my last response to you ... to give you yet another opportunity to actually discuss the FACTS instead of simply basing all your arguments on smearing people's character ... as you have done above. Here goes ...

"What you keep running from is that ALL the experts directly involved in the case now say the wound looked like a bullet wound and there should have been an autopsy. Some even called for an autopsy DURING the examination but the government stooge, Colonel Gormley, said no. But even Gormley now admits that there should have been an autopsy based on the nature of the wound. The photos and x-rays (those that still exist after SOMEONE in the government ... remember they were in a locked safe ... got through destroying the rest) suggest a gunshot. That is the opinion of several very qualified forensic pathologists that were not present at the examination, including Cyril Wecht, who is one of the top people in the profession. Plus we have the FACT that management at AFIP (Gormley, Dickerson and others) have been caught LYING to the public about the nature of the wound and the status of the photos and x-rays. All of that, plus everything else that I've listed for you countless times before, certainly SUGGESTS that Brown might not have died as the result of an accident. We have motive, opportunity and means. Why do you FEAR a simple exhumation and autopsy SO much ... "

Well, NOW do you have a response? Or will you STILL refuse to discuss those pathologists and x-rays ... like a democRAT would refuse to discuss them? See? I don't need anyone "protecting" me. Now let's see if you can handle a FACTUAL response on YOUR own.

206 posted on 01/17/2002 9:42:13 AM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: BeAChooser
Scenario A=They shoot him on the ground, before the flight takes off and do the "Weekend at Bernie's" thing.

Scenario B=They shoot him while in flight, in front of all the passengers, then talk the pilot into crashing the airplane.

Scenario C=They have a team waiting in the mountains in case Ron survived the crash, who will shoot him. Of course, not really knowing WHERE the plane would crash, they must have had hundreds of hit men out there.

Then, they get literally HUNDREDS of people, Air Force personnel, families, friends, etc. to participate in the cover-up.

207 posted on 01/17/2002 10:36:25 AM PST by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson