Posted on 01/11/2002 8:57:38 AM PST by vannrox
(The party & philosophy)
Out of the many political philosophies that exist, one of the most misunderstood is libertarianism. It is frequently labeled part of the “extreme right”, or it is merely associated with drug legalization. Truthfully, there may be several definitions of the term, but in general, libertarianism encompasses all or most of the following: strong support of individual civil liberties, social tolerance, and private property; belief in the positive powers of the free market; and an espousal of constitutionally limited and greatly reduced government. To put it succinctly, the libertarian believes in the freedom of individuals to pursue their lives as they see fit, as long as they cause no harm to others, with minimal governmental interference.
Libertarian thought is rooted historically in the ideas of many of the Enlightenment thinkers, including John Locke, Voltaire, and Adam Smith, as well as many of the founding fathers of America, including Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and Thomas Paine. Many libertarians prefer to call themselves “classical liberals”. Their philosophy has also been influenced by writer Ayn Rand’s “Objectivism”, and various free-market economists, including Milton Friedman, F.A. Hayek, and Ludwig von Mises.
To more clearly illustrate libertarian thoughts and beliefs, it is helpful to see how these ideas would affect certain issues being debated at this time. Specifically, Freedom of Speech,
(Keep in mind that libertarians, like most people, don’t agree on everything. In fact, their emphasis on individualism gives rise to a great deal of disagreement.)
The international scene (including military defense),
Taxation,
and, of course, Drug Prohibition.
Libertarians are strongly supportive of the civil liberties detailed in the Bill of Rights of our Constitution. They maintain that the Constitution does not grant us these rights, but instead recognizes those rights we naturally possess by virtue of our humanity. Included in these rights is the freedom of speech. Unlike many other supporters of free speech, the libertarian sees it as having a connection with property rights. For example, many would claim that to deny the publication of a certain person’s ideas or works would be censorship. The libertarian would say that you can publish anything you would like on a printing press you personally own, but to force someone else to print it would be coercion.
Another area in which libertarians have a unique philosophy is that concerning international affairs, military defense, and police functions. Many in the libertarian movement believe that the only legitimate functions of government are to provide military protection and law enforcement. They would oppose those “entangling alliances” that Jefferson mentioned which lead to treaties like NATO and organizations like the United Nations. They believe these can lead to unnecessary entanglements with other nations, and may ultimately usurp the sovereignty of the individual.
When it comes to the issue of taxes, it is helpful to reflect on the libertarian’s view of property rights. The libertarian view is generally that an individual should have the right to do with his property what he will, as long as it is not causing harm to someone else. In this case, the property being considered is the money an individual has earned. If the result of your labor is money, then it belongs to you, not the government. If another individual came along and took your money from you without your consent, it would be considered theft by our legal system. The libertarian views it as no less a crime when the government takes your money without your consent via taxation. (In those cases where taxation is “necessary”, libertarians prefer the taxes to be low and only minimally intrusive.)
The aspect most often associated with its philosophy by people only marginally familiar with libertarianism concerns the subject of drug legalization. What should be remembered is that the libertarian advocates personal freedom, which they believe includes the right to make decisions concerning your own body. They would argue that today’s drug prohibition is very similar to the alcohol prohibition of the 1920’s, which helped spawn a great deal of criminal activity, profiteering for criminal gangs, and turned otherwise peaceful, law-abiding citizens into criminals. (Of course, if the use of drugs by an individual causes them to harm another, that person must take responsibility for their actions, and must make restitution or receive appropriate punishment.) They also believe that the “drug war” has largely been a failure in its goals, and has diverted law enforcement away from other, more serious crimes.
Libertarian philosophy can be applied to most any issue being debated in our time. By looking at the four areas of freedom of speech, international affairs, taxation, and drug policy, it is easy to see that libertarian thought at its most basic level agrees with Jefferson’s statement, “That government is best which governs least.”
Written by Deanna Corbeil
No, just an anti-authoritarian.
Do you LIKE the idea that personal responsibility is being destroyed by government legislated morality?
I guess the author of the piece forgot to address the "Party" part in her title, which you obviously overlooked yourself.
Perhaps the author was too embarrassed to address the "Party" part. Try reading it again.
It wasn't a Libertarian who first tried to shift this thread to a "drug war" thread.
A member of an unimportant third party who thinks his parties ideas have a huge influence on the other two.
"keep it up--it really shows off your lack of principle"
Running out of arguments eh?
I also agree that smoking kills the user and perhaps those they blow smoke on. Here in CA we love the no smoking laws. It smells real nice when you go out to eat now.
Smokers don't lose their mind or cause death by their driving and so forth. I do think a future issue for smokers will be that insurance companys won't cover their health for cancer in the future. Nobody can afford the cancer it causes.
Not smoking is a healthy and good thing Dakmar.
Could you expand on this? I disagree vehemently, I *hate* being treated like a criminal when I get my blood-pressure medicine prescription refilled. Why do I need written permission? Why did Congress promise that the Pure Food Drug and Cosmetic Act would never be used to prevent self-medication? Where did they find the power to do so?
Does that help? BTW, that's "TheDon" to you! ;)
A statist is someone who believes that, if he disapproves of something, then there should be a law against it, and if he approves of something, then there should be a government program subsidizing it
A Libertarian is someone who believes that government should be restricted to maintaining a safe environment where people can live, work, and raise a family without fear of violence (internal or foreign), and to providing a court system for resolving disputes. A Libertarian is someone who thinks that if you give lots of power to government officials (even for the "best" of reasons), eventually that power will be used against the people
Just because I think government should not be involved in suppressing some activity, does NOT mean that I approve of, or indulge in, that activity. Just because I'm against government subsidies for an activity, does NOT mean that I'm against that activity
LOL, you ignore the real arguement, I see.
And that comment coming from someone whose main tactic is lies and smears, is funny as hell.
The main article brought up the drug issue. Not me. GO READ THE ARTICLE ARON!
They work at the library. They organize books and give you dirty looks when you're too noisy. I think they smoke dope when no ones looking too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.